Cases 61 - 70 of 14,678
Carrello v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv03543
Plaintiff:
Joseph F. Carrello
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Ellert v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00191
Plaintiff:
Clayton W Ellert
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Fox v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00190
Plaintiff:
Deanna Fox
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Donald v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00650
Plaintiff:
Sheryl Renee Donald
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Gilbert v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2024cv02308
Not Yet Classified:
Joe W. Brown
Plaintiff:
Sam L Gilbert
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Ewert v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00231
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Joseph Ewert
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Drinkwater v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03848
Plaintiff:
Mary Drinkwater
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Curlett v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00572
Plaintiff:
Madison Curlett
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
McPherson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
Monte McPherson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Vanburen v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00759
Plaintiff:
Tyler A Vanburen
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSAOGC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
