Cases 1 - 10 of 208
Claiborne v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv00704
Plaintiff:
David Claiborne
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Caiafa v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv01144
Plaintiff:
David R. Caiafa
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Dennis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
David Lee Dennis, Jr. and David L. Dennis, Jr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Yet Classified:
General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Miller v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv07372
Plaintiff:
David P. Miller
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Donahue v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv05118
Plaintiff:
David Donahue o/b/o Bernadine Donahue-Walsh and David Donahue
Defendant:
Comm'r of SSA Kilolo Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Lerum v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv00032
Plaintiff:
David Clifford Lerum
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
North v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv01819
Plaintiff:
David C. North
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Duck v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv00890
Plaintiff:
David J. Duck
Defendant:
Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Tano v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 3:2022cv01660
Plaintiff:
Scott David Tano
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
David Warner v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 22-2871
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID A. WARNER
Defendant / Appellee:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
