Cases 101 - 110 of 270
Ingersoll-Rand Company & Subsidiaries v. United States of America
as 3:2016cv00289
Plaintiff:
Ingersoll-Rand Company & Subsidiaries
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SPAULDING
as 1:2016cv00496
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
HAZEL MICHELLE SPAULDING
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
UNITED STATES v. VERBAL et al
as 1:2016cv00441
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
CLAUDE ARTHUR VERBAL, II, LESLIE LOUISE BREWSTER, NIKKI ANNE BREWSTER and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7407
United States v. Johnson et al DO NOT docket in this case. New case number 2:16-CV-20-D.
as 4:2016cv00059
Plaintiff:
United States of America (USA)
Defendant:
Francis M. Johnson, Nathalie Elizabeth Pate Johnson Morse, Elizabeth Pate Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403
United States v. Johnson et al
as 2:2016cv00020
Plaintiff:
United States of America (USA)
Defendant:
Francis M. Johnson, Nathalie Elizabeth Pate Johnson Morse, Elizabeth Pate Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403
United States of America v. Barnett
as 5:2016cv00150
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Tonia R. Barnett
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
United States of America v. Wright et al
as 1:2016cv00052
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Wittner Wright, Lisa Wright, Adult Care Specialists, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
COGGIN V. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2016cv00106
Plaintiff:
ALICE COGGIN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
USA v. WILLIAMS
as 1:2015cv01090
Defendant:
EVELYN WILLIAMS
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
United States of America v. Pruitt, et al
as 5:2015cv00623
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Randall V. Pruitt and Tressa J. Pruitt
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
