Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Marra v. United States of America
as 2:2020cv01175
Petitioner:
Jamison F Marra
Respondent:
United States of America Department of Treasury Internal Revenue Service and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00283
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
Shima v. United States
as 4:2017cv05093
Petitioner:
Douglas Toshiyuki Shima
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
United States of America v. Veghte
as 2:2015cv00089
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
William L. Veghte
Intervenor:
Microsoft Corporation
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
United States of America v. Michelle Mathews
as 2:2015cv00092
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Michelle Mathews
Intervenor:
Microsoft Corporation
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
Dees v. United States of America
as 3:2012cv05361
Petitioner:
Donald R. Dees
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Lasko v. United States of America et al
as 2:2012cv00353
Petitioner:
Barbara Jean Lasko
Respondent:
United States of America, Internal Revenue Service, Alyssa Rucker and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
Action Recycling Inc v. United States of America et al
as 2:2011cv00457
Petitioner:
Action Recycling Inc
Respondent:
United States of America and Heather Blair
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
Munson v. United States of America et al
as 3:2011cv05893
Plaintiff:
Troy J Munson
Defendant:
United States of America, Internal Revenue Service and Eric Nix
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 982
Advanced Chiropractic Health and Wellness Center v. United States of America et al
as 3:2011cv05817
Plaintiff:
Advanced Chiropractic Health and Wellness Center
Defendant:
United States of America, Internal Revenue Service and Eric Nix
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
