Cases 91 - 100 of 2,125
WATSON-DAVIS v. WILLIAMS et al
as 1:2023cv00318
Plaintiff:
JANELLE NICOLE WATSON-DAVIS
Defendant:
JASON WILLIAMS and SANTANDER CONSUMER USA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640 Truth in Lending
Azima v. American Express Company
as 2:2023cv00028
Plaintiff:
Farhad Azima
Defendant:
American Express Company
Woolens v. Ruckle et al
as 7:2023cv00125
Plaintiff:
William D. Woolens
Defendant:
Charlene Denise Ruckle, Wanda Moore and Jill Switzer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Biddle v. Easier Funding, LLC
as 1:2023cv00064
Plaintiff:
Damon E. Biddle
Defendant:
Easier Funding, LLC doing business as 60 Day Credit Repair
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gean v. Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00205
Plaintiff:
Thomasina Cofield Gean
Defendant:
Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC, PHH Mortgage Corporation and Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Mescall v. United States Department of Treasury et al
as 3:2023cv00078
Plaintiff:
Gerald T. Mescall
Defendant:
United States Department of Treasury, U.S. Bureau of Fiscal Service, Debt Management Servicing Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Pereira v. Nucor Corporation
as 3:2023mc00024
Petitioner:
Jose Henrique Soares Pereira
Respondent:
Nucor Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
Kreuz v. Carolina Finance, LLC et al
as 5:2021cv00497
Plaintiff:
Stephen Kreuz
Counter Claimant:
Carolina Finance, LLC
Defendant:
NC Recovery Services, Inc. and Manheim Remarketing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101 Bankruptcy
Brearley et al v. FDH Infrastructure Services LLC
as 5:2023cv00047
Plaintiff:
Ladson Brearley and Rakesh Khan
Defendant:
FDH Infrastructure Services LLC
Randall et al v. Metzger
as 1:2023cv00043
Defendant:
K. D. Bryson, William Randall, Kevin David Bryson and others
Plaintiff:
Chad Metzger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
