Cases 101 - 110 of 1,052
The State of Mississippi v. Google, LLC
as 1:2019cv00220
Defendant:
Google, LLC
Plaintiff:
The State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tishomingo County, Mississippi v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv00238
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Tishomingo County, Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Singing River Health System et al v. Grace et al
as 1:2019cv00937
Defendant:
Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Janssen Pharmaceutica, Inc., Abbott Laboratories and others
Plaintiff:
Singing River Health System, Field Memorial Community Hospital, Tippah County Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Robinson v. I.C. System, Inc.
as 3:2019cv00818
Plaintiff:
Shyla Robinson
Defendant:
I.C. System, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
City of Brookhaven, Mississippi v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al
as 5:2019cv00127
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Cardinal Health, Inc., McKesson Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
City of Brookhaven, Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Davis v. Palace Casino
as 1:2019cv00968
Plaintiff:
Nigellus Devonte Davis
Defendant:
Palace Casino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pie Development, LLC v. Pie Insurance Holdings, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00792
Defendant:
Pie Insurance Holdings, Inc., Dax Craig, John Swigart and others
Plaintiff:
Pie Development, LLC
Davis v. Bancorp South et al
as 1:2019cv00970
Plaintiff:
Nigellus Devonte Davis
Defendant:
Community Bank and Bancorp South
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Davis v. McDonalds
as 1:2019cv00974
Plaintiff:
Nigellus Devonte Davis
Defendant:
McDonalds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Davis v. Biloxi Police Dept.
as 1:2019cv00965
Plaintiff:
Nigellus Devonte Davis
Defendant:
Biloxi Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
