Cases 11 - 16 of 16
USA, et al v. Caremark, Inc, et al
as 5:2012cv00929
Neutral:
Karl Bayer and Paul Stickney
Special Master:
Karl Bayer
Intervenor Defendant:
Caremark Inc. and Caremark RX, Inc.
Defendant:
Caremark International Holdings, Inc., Caremark International, Inc., Caremark RX, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
District of Columbia, Janaki Ramados, State of Delaware and others
Movant:
Health Care of Delaware, Inc., HealthAssurance of Pennsylvania, McKesson Corporation and others
Notice Only Party:
KPMG LLP, Medco Health Solutions, Inc., Public Consulting Group, Inc. and others
919)571-4837 (fax:
State of North Carolina
Intervenor Plaintiff:
The State of California, United States Of America, the State of Arkansas and others
Unknown:
Nicholas Bagley, Meredith Lynn Burrell and Jeanette L. Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Securities And Exchange Commission v. Espuelas et al
as 1:2011cv00025
Plaintiff:
Securities And Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Fernando J. Espuelas, Jack C. Chen, Steven J. Heller and others
Respondent:
Morris, Manning & Martin, LLP
Movant:
KPMG LLP
Securities And Exchange Commission v. Espuelas et al
as 1:2010mi00207
Plaintiff:
Securities And Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Fernando J. Espuelas, Jack C. Chen, Steven J. Heller and others
Respondent:
Morris, Manning & Martin, LLP
Movant:
KPMG LLP
Ahmad Hamad Algosaibi & Brothers Company v. KPMG LLP
as 1:2010cv07052
Petitioner:
Ahmad Hamad Algosaibi & Brothers Company
Respondent:
KPMG LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782
Dennis v. Tremont Group Holdings Inc et al
as 2:2009cv00315
Plaintiff:
John Dennis
Defendant:
Tremont Group Holdings Inc, Tremont Partners Inc, Rye Investment Management and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
CONNOLLY et al v. ERNST & YOUNG LLP et al
as 1:2009cv00110
Plaintiff:
JOHN CONNOLLY
Defendant:
ERNST & YOUNG LLP, KATHRYN A. OBERLY, PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
