Cases 21 - 27 of 27
Maverick Gaming LLC v. United States of America et al
as 3:2022cv05325
Plaintiff:
Maverick Gaming LLC
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Department of the Interior, Deb Haaland and others
Intervenor:
Shoalwater Bay Tribe
Amicus Curiae:
Suquamish Tribe, Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation, Hoh Indian Tribe and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
NAVAJO NATION v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR et al
as 1:2022cv01182
Plaintiff:
NAVAJO NATION
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and DEB HAALAND
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640 Indian Tribal Rights
FEHILY et al v. BIDEN JR. et al
as 3:2022cv02120
Plaintiff:
PATRICK FEHILY and DAVID T. MALLEY
Defendant:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN JR., GINA RAIMONDO and DEB HAALAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
MAVERICK GAMING LLC v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2022cv00068
Plaintiff:
MAVERICK GAMING LLC
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, DEB HAALAND and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
OVINTIV USA INC. v. HAALAND et al
as 1:2021cv02552
Plaintiff:
Ovintiv USA Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
DEBRA HAALAND and DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Defendant:
KIMBRA DAVIS, DEBRA A. HAALAND, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
PATTERSON v. HAALAND et al
as 1:2021cv02391
Plaintiff:
THOMAS PATTERSON
Defendant:
DEB HAALAND and U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
TANNER-BROWN et al v. DE LA VEGA et al
as 1:2021cv00565
Plaintiff:
HARVEST INSTITUTE FREEDMEN FEDERATION, LLC and LEATRICE TANNER-BROWN
Defendant:
TARA MACLEAN SWEENEY, SCOTT DE LA VEGA and DEB HAALAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
