Other Statutory Actions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 3,115
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 24-1995
Defendant: KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Plaintiff: GILBERT P. HYATT
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 24-1992
Defendant: KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Plaintiff: GILBERT P. HYATT
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 24-1993
Plaintiff: GILBERT P. HYATT
Defendant: KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 24-1994
Defendant: KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Plaintiff: GILBERT P. HYATT
In Re Connell
as 1:2024mc00286
Defendant: Ryan P. Connell
Cause Of Action: Disbarment Proceedings
Rodio et al v. Raposo et al
as 3:2024mc00065
Defendant: RPM Homes, LLC and Daniel P. Raposo
Plaintiff: Leonardo Rodio and Daniel M. Rodio
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
Rodio et al v. Raposo et al
as 3:2024mc00066
Defendant: RPM Homes, LLC and Daniel P. Raposo
Plaintiff: Daniel M. Rodio and Leonardo Rodio
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
George Sachs v. Ricardo Inc., et al
as 24-1468
Defendant: DARSHAN KARWAT, POLARIS STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, MARCUS LEHMANN and others
Plaintiff: GEORGE SACHS, dba Paradyme Systems USA
Wade v. Michigan, State of et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv11402
Defendant: Leo P. Carey, Anthony F. Lubkin, Swanson and others
Plaintiff: Quan D. Wade
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Duneske v. Nerswick
as 2:2024cv11390
Plaintiff: Lindsay Ann Duneske
Defendant: Charles P. Nerswick
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?