Cases 31 - 40 of 67
Hill v. CACH, LLC et al
as 4:2015cv00420
Defendant:
CACH, LLC and John C. Bonewicz, P.C.
Plaintiff:
Jada Hill
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Campbell v. United States of America
as 4:2015cv00186
Petitioner:
Steven C. Campbell
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Griffard v. CACH LLC et al
as 4:2014cv01999
Defendant:
CACH LLC and John C. Bonewicz, P.C.
Plaintiff:
Maria T. Griffard
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
A. et al v. Wentzville R-IV School District et al
as 4:2014cv01839
Plaintiff:
J. A. , C. A. and G. A.
Defendant:
Wentzville R-IV School District and Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Zimmer v. Integrated Pain Management
as 4:2014cv01121
Plaintiff:
Michael C. Zimmer, D.C., P.C.,
Defendant:
Integrated Pain Management, S.C. and John Does 1 - 10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Bales v. CACH, LLC et al
as 4:2014cv00926
Defendant:
John C. Bonewicz, P.C. , CACH, LLC and John C Bonewicz
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Bales
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Leffler v. Miller and Steeno, P.C. et al
as 4:2013cv01764
Plaintiff:
Megan Leffler
Defendant:
Miller and Steeno, P.C. , Stephen J. Barber , Ronald C. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Michael C Zimmer D C Professional Corp v. Moore Medical, LLC et al
as 4:2013cv01000
Plaintiff:
Michael C Zimmer D C Professional Corp
Defendant:
Moore Medical, LLC , McKesson Medical-Surgical, Inc. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00052
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Windwolf v. Hillsboro Title Company, Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv00041
Plaintiff:
Piaowaka C. Windwolf
Defendant:
Hillsboro Title Company, Inc. and CitiMortgage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3731 Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
