Cases 41 - 50 of 50
Harmon v. Accounts Receivable Management, Inc.
as 9:2008cv81438
Plaintiff:
Monica A Harmon
Defendant:
Accounts Receivable Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lanham v. Accounts Receivable Management, Inc
as 1:2008cv00114
Plaintiff:
Thomas Lanham
Defendant:
Accounts Receivable Management, Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Johnson v. Accounts Receivable Management, Inc.
as 1:2007cv06763
Plaintiff:
Queencandace Johnson
Defendant:
Accounts Receivable Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Tauber v. Accounts Receivable Management, Inc.
as 0:2007cv61698
Plaintiff:
Gregory Tauber
Defendant:
Accounts Receivable Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Forde v. Accounts Receivable Management, Inc.
as 0:2007cv61638
Plaintiff:
Patricka R. Forde
Defendant:
Accounts Receivable Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Tauber v. Accounts Receivable Management, Inc.
as 0:2007cv61473
Plaintiff:
Gregory Tauber
Defendant:
Accounts Receivable Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Thomas v. Accounts Receivable Management, Inc.
as 9:2007cv80724
Plaintiff:
Kenyatta L. Thomas
Defendant:
Accounts Receivable Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jennette v. Accounts Receivable Management, Inc.
as 0:2007cv61119
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Jennette
Defendant:
Accounts Receivable Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Bellows v. Accounts Receivable Management Inc
as 3:2007cv00758
Plaintiff:
Douglas E Bellows
Defendant:
Accounts Receivable Management Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Neal v. Accounts Receivable Management Inc
as 1:2007cv01078
Plaintiff:
William A Neal, Jr and William A Neal, Jr
Defendant:
Accounts Receivable Management Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
