Cases 41 - 50 of 361
HEARD v. MEXICANS et al
as 1:2019cv02054
Defendant:
MEXICANS, V. PUTIN, JOHN AND JANE DOES and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HEARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HEARD v. MEXICANS et al
as 1:2019cv02378
Defendant:
MARTY ALLEN, MEXICANS, JOHN AND JANE DOE and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HEARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rogers v. Doe
as 5:2019cv00115
Defendant:
John or Jane Doe
Plaintiff:
Dylan T. Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Liona v. American Elite Recovery, LLC et al
as 0:2019cv60325
Defendant:
John and Jane Doe 1-10, American Elite Recovery, LLC and American Recovery Systems, LLC
Plaintiff:
Marisa Liona
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Sawicki v. Greene et al
as 1:2019cv01736
Plaintiff:
Christopher R. Sawicki, II
Defendant:
Martin J. Coleman, Courtney Ann Greene and John and Jane Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wolhendler v. Goldberg et al
as 1:2019cv00457
Defendant:
Yaakov (Shulem) Vizel, Henry Grunbaum, Mark (Moishe) Silber and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Wolhendler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Baldwin v. Victory Services et al
as 8:2019cv00149
Defendant:
Victory Services, DC Processing and John and Jane Doe, numbers 1-10
Plaintiff:
Roseann Baldwin
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Craig Juan Gilbert v. United States Attorney for the State of California et al
as 5:2018cv02504
Plaintiff:
Craig Juan Gilbert
Defendant:
John and Jane Doe and United States Attorney for the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Switz v. Sunrise Credit Services Inc et al
as 1:2018cv01677
Defendant:
Sunrise Credit Services Inc and John and Jane Does
Plaintiff:
Emily Switz
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Servin v. Central Portfolio Control Inc et al
as 1:2018cv01421
Defendant:
Central Portfolio Control Inc, JOHN AND JANES DOES 1 THROUGH 25 and John and Jane Does
Plaintiff:
EMMANUEL SERVIN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
