Cases 41 - 50 of 92
Juergens et al v. Travis Law Firm PLC et al
as 2:2014cv01190
Defendant:
Travis Law Firm PLC , Chandler W Travis and Unknown Travis
Plaintiff:
Todd E Juergens and Jacqueline A Juergens
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Harbecke v. Jerold Kaplan Law Office PC et al
as 2:2014cv00915
Plaintiff:
LaDonna Harbecke
Defendant:
Jerold Kaplan Law Office PC and Midland Funding LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Marmol v. Law Firm of Allan C. Smith PC
as 2:2014cv00304
Plaintiff:
Rose Marmol
Defendant:
Law Firm of Allan C. Smith PC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Torrie v. Goodman Law Offices PC et al
as 2:2013cv02659
Plaintiff:
Megan Torrie
Defendant:
Goodman Law Offices PC, Clint Goodman and Unknown Goodman
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
LeBarts v. Red Rock Financial Services LLC et al
as 2:2013cv02024
Defendant:
Red Rock Financial Services LLC, Waldron Law Group PLLC and Mark Waldron
Plaintiff:
Julie LeBarts
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Penney et al v. Neuheisel et al
as 2:2013cv01577
Plaintiff:
Teresa D Penney and George Penney
Defendant:
Kathryn A Neuheisel, Unknown Neuheisel and Neuheisel Law Firm PC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Ring v. Waldron Law Group PLLC
as 2:2013cv01258
Defendant:
Waldron Law Group PLLC
Plaintiff:
Stephen Ring
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Prenda Law Incorporated v. Godfread et al
as 2:2013mc00030
Defendant:
Paul Godfread, Alan Cooper and Unknown Parties
Movant:
Unknown Party
Plaintiff:
Prenda Law Incorporated
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Reynolds v. Law Office of Tanis A Duncan
as 4:2013cv00253
Plaintiff:
Steven Reynolds
Defendant:
Law Office of Tanis A Duncan
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Montoya v. Neuheisel Law Firm PC
as 2:2013cv00216
Plaintiff:
Linda Montoya
Defendant:
Neuheisel Law Firm PC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
