Cases 81 - 90 of 94
COMMUNITY ONCOLOGY ALLIANCE, INC. v. OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET et al
as 1:2018cv01256
Plaintiff:
COMMUNITY ONCOLOGY ALLIANCE, INC.
Defendant:
OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET , MICK MULVANEY , DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
STI PHARMA, LLC v. AZAR et al
as 1:2018cv01231
Plaintiff:
STI PHARMA, LLC
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, SEEMA VERMA and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Infinity Healthcare Services, Inc. v. Azar II
as 4:2018cv01626
Plaintiff:
Infinity Healthcare Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Alex M Azar II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Adams EMS, Inc. v. Azar
as 4:2018cv01443
Defendant:
Alex M. Azar, II
Plaintiff:
Adams EMS, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
CHOCTAW NATION OF OKLAHOMA v. AZAR et al
as 1:2018cv00971
Plaintiff:
CHOCTAW NATION OF OKLAHOMA
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
William Sabatini v. Alex Azar, II
as 18-55482
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM L. SABATINI, R.N., CRNA
Defendant - Appellee:
ALEX M. AZAR II, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services
Dobson v. Azar
as 4:2018cv10038
Plaintiff:
Donald Dobson
Defendant:
Alex M Azar, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
SEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA v. AZAR et al
as 1:2018cv00776
Plaintiff:
SEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II and MICHAEL D. WEAHKEE
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640
Han Ma Eum, Incorporated v. Alex Azar, Secretary
as 18-20203
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HAN MA EUM, INCORPORATED, a Texas Corporation, doing business as Coastal Home Health Care
Defendant - Appellee:
ALEX M. AZAR, II, SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
KINDRED HEALTHCARE, INC. v. AZAR
as 1:2018cv00650
Plaintiff:
KINDRED HEALTHCARE, INC.
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
