Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Loza v. Pimentel et al
as 2:2019cv05086
Defendant:
Omar Calderon Amador, Stephanie A Olivera, Jose Pimentel and others
Plaintiff:
Raul Loza
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 32710
Hilda Loza v. CBE Group Inc et al
as 5:2013cv02060
Defendant:
CBE Group Inc and Does
Plaintiff:
Hilda Loza
J & J Sports Productions Incorporated v. Loza et al
as 2:2013cv00931
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions Incorporated
Defendant:
Agustin Loza and Reymundo Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Communications Act of 1934
Parker et al v. Lithia Motors, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv01326
Plaintiff:
Michael Parker and Rick Zimmerman
Defendant:
Lithia Motors, Inc., Lithia Motors Support Services, Inc., Vincent Armijo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bey v. Arlington Texas City of et al
as 5:2012cv00911
Defendant:
Arlington Texas City of, Arlington Texas Police Department, Officer Deary and others
Plaintiff:
Noble T Hasaan Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Genoveva Ocampo Cataldi Loza S, et al v. Estado Plurinacional de Bolivi, et al
as 12-14171
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GENOVEVA MARIA LUISA OCAMPO CATALDI LOZA SANTIVANEZ, an individual and MARCEL FRANCISCO LEON OCAMPO CATALDI LOZA SANTIVANEZ, an individual
Defendant - Appellee:
ESTADO PLURINACIONAL DE BOLIVIA, f.k.a. La Republica de Bolivia, PRESIDENCIA DEL ESTADO PLURINACIONAL, f.k.a. Presidencia de La Republica de Bolivia, VICEPRESIDENCIA DEL ESTADO PLURINACIONAL DE BOLIVIA, f.k.a. Vicepresidencia de La Republica de Bolivia and others
Ocampo Cataldi Loza Santivanez et al v. Estado Plurinacional de Bolivia
as 1:2010cv22097
Plaintiff:
Genoveva Maria Luisa Ocampo Cataldi Loza Santivanez and Marcel Francisco Leon Ocampo Cataldi Loza Santivanez
Defendant:
Estado Plurinacional de Bolivia, Presidencia del Estado Plurinacional de Bolivia, Vicepresidencia del Estado Plurinacional de Bolivia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1602
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
