Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Doe v. Constant
as 1:2024cv00554
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Douglas Constant and Unknown Persons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Kaddex, LLC v. DMCA 17 U.S.C. 512(h) SUBPOENA TO THE CONSTANT COMPANY, LLC.
as 3:2023mc80063
In Re:
DMCA 17 U.S.C. 512(h) Subpoena to the Constant Company, LLC. doing business as Vultr
Petitioner:
Kaddex, LLC
Herbert v. Miller et al
as 1:2021cv24446
Plaintiff:
Wilton Ken Herbert
Defendant:
Walter Dale Miller, Esq., Jane Doe, Esq., Ramiro Gustavo Kruss, Esq. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raymond James Financial Services Inc. v. Armijos et al
as 9:2019cv81692
Defendant:
Elsa Magdalena Calva Ulloa, Ana del Carmen Narv Chacon, Maria Gabriela Darquea and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond James Financial Services Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Warner v. Constant Contact, Inc.
as 0:2019cv62756
Defendant:
CONSTANT CONTACT, INC and Constant Contact, Inc.
Plaintiff:
William Warner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States of America v. Eighteen Karat Club et al
as 2:2019mc00087
Defendant:
R. L. Frick, James G. Donavan, Shreve & Company and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and United States of America
Constant v. Credit First National Association
as 2:2019cv00219
Plaintiff:
Matthew Constant
Defendant:
Credit First National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Vertus-Constant v. Leonard
as 1:2019cv00292
Defendant:
James J. Leonard
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Vertus-Constant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv05673
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
BENNETT v. HART et al
as 1:2015mc00445
Plaintiff:
VAUGHN BENNETT
Defendant:
SHAMARDA HART, SARAH CONSTANT, WALTER KUBIAK and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
