Cases 1 - 10 of 14
TURNER v. SHERMAN et al
as 1:2022cv02254
Plaintiff:
LAMESHA TURNER
Defendant:
STEPHANIE SHERMAN, DALLAS DART POLICE, LISD JAMIE HOLDER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Austin v. Dart
as 1:2021cv05006
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Austin
Defendant:
Tom Dart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Daniel v. Dart et al
as 1:2019cv02591
Defendant:
Thomas Dart and Cook County, Illinois
Plaintiff:
Reggie Daniel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flores v. Dart Container Corporation, a Nevada corporation et al
as 2:2019at00037
Defendant:
Dart Container Corporation, a Nevada corporation and Dart Container Corporation of California, a Michigan corporation
Plaintiff:
Angela Flores
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Flores v. Dart Container Corporation
as 2:2019cv00083
Plaintiff:
Angela Flores
Defendant:
Dart Container Corporation of California and Dart Container Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Haven v. Dart Transit Company
as 3:2019cv00024
Plaintiff:
Leslie Haven
Defendant:
Dart Transit Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gomes v. Synchrony Bank
as 8:2016cv02861
Plaintiff:
Darte Gomes
Defendant:
Synchrony Bank
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Maher v. Dart et al
as 1:2012cv03889
Plaintiff:
John N Maher
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart , Cook County and Cook County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
STYRENE INFORMATION AND RESEARCH CENTER, INC., et al v. SEBELIUS et al
as 1:2011cv01079
Plaintiff:
STYRENE INFORMATION AND RESEARCH CENTER, INC., and DART CONTAINER CORPORATION
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Dunn v. Dart et al
as 4:2009cv00220
Plaintiff:
Donald J. Dunn
Defendant:
Henry T. Dart, Robert E Zaytoun and Robert E Zaytoun
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
