Cases 1 - 10 of 45
BAILEY v. VELOCITY INVESTMENTS LLC et al
as 2:2020cv03768
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-25, VELOCITY INVESTMENTS LLC and Global Credit & Collection Corp
Plaintiff:
LATASHA BAILEY
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
ORTIZ v. GLOBAL CREDIT & COLLECTION CORP. et al
as 2:2019cv03271
Plaintiff:
MELINDA ORTIZ
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-25 and GLOBAL CREDIT & COLLECTION CORP.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Prince v. Global Credit & Collection Corp. et al
as 1:2019cv04769
Defendant:
LVNV Funding, LLC, Resurgent Capital Services, LP and Global Credit & Collection Corp.
Plaintiff:
Robin Prince
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Reitz v. Global Credit & Collection Corp.
as 1:2019cv03425
Plaintiff:
Louise Reitz
Defendant:
Global Credit & Collection Corp.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
DUNCAN v. GLOBAL CREDIT & COLLECTION CORP. et al
as 1:2018cv03022
Defendant:
LVNV FUNDING, LLC and GLOBAL CREDIT & COLLECTION CORP.
Plaintiff:
ENOCH DUNCAN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Young v. Global Credit & Collection Corp. et al
as 1:2018cv04494
Plaintiff:
Geoffrey Young
Defendant:
Global Credit & Collection Corp. and PYOD, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
MINES v. GALAXY INTERNATIONAL PURCHASING, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv04746
Defendant:
GALAXY INTERNATIONAL PURCHASING, LLC and GLOBAL CREDIT & COLLECTION CORP.
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MINES
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Goethel v. Global Credit & Collection Corp
as 1:2017cv08852
Plaintiff:
Nancy Goethel
Defendant:
Global Credit & Collection Corp and John Does 1-25
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Brooks v. Global Credit & Collection Corp.
as 1:2017cv07158
Plaintiff:
Helen Brooks
Defendant:
Global Credit & Collection Corp.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Banks v. Global Credit & Collection Corp.
as 1:2017cv06212
Plaintiff:
Tanisha Banks
Defendant:
Global Credit & Collection Corp.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
