Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Johnson v. U.S. Marine Corps et al
as 7:2024cv00425
Plaintiff:
R. Wayne Johnson
Defendant:
U.S. Marine Corps and John - Jane Does 1 -50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Doe v. Sultan
as 3:2023cv00667
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Fard Sultan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gean v. Charlotte Health and Rehabilitation Center et al
as 3:2023cv00264
Plaintiff:
Thomasina Cofield Gean
Defendant:
Charlotte Health and Rehabilitation Center and John/Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bailey v. University of Oxford et al
as 3:2015cv00436
Plaintiff:
Jay Bailey
Defendant:
University of Oxford, University of Cambridge, The Dons of Oxford and Cambridge and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cunningham v. Ortiz et al
as 5:2015cv00465
Plaintiff:
Craig Cunningham
Defendant:
Justin Ortiz, Medical Life Alarm, LLC, PNHC, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. BAYER A.G. et al
as 1:2012cv00773
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and JUAN N. WALTERSPIEL, M.D.
Defendant:
BAYER A.G., QUINTILES TRANSNATIONAL CORP. , JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Supler v. Collecto, Inc., et al
as 4:2012cv00100
Plaintiff:
Jonathan W. Supler
Defendant:
Collecto, Inc. and John and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Suleman v. Shineski et al
as 4:2010cv00119
Plaintiff:
Jawal Suleman
Defendant:
Erik K Shineski , Elizabeth Goolsby , United States Department of Veterans Affairs and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Suleman v. Shineski et al
as 5:2010cv00355
Plaintiff:
Jawal Suleman
Defendant:
Erik K Shineski , Elizabeth Goolsby , United States Department of Veterans Affairs and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Supler v. RGS FINANCIAL, INC. et al
as 5:2010cv00111
Plaintiff:
Jonathan W. Supler
Defendant:
RGS FINANCIAL, INC. and JOHN AND JANE DOES NUMBERS 1 THROUGH 25
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
