Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Jaeger et al v. Jaeger et al
as 3:2022cv04615
Plaintiff:
Andrew Jaeger and SLP Advisory LLP
Defendant:
Abigail Jaeger, Brittany T Kaliher, Beam Technologies LLC and others
Counter Claimant:
Andrew Patterson
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511 Wiretapping
Neeley et al v. Sumter Auto Mall et al
as 3:2017cv02880
Plaintiff:
Karen Neeley and Glenn Neeley
Defendant:
Sumter Auto Mall and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 32710
Rice v. AY Auto Credit & Leasing LLC et al
as 6:2016cv03248
Plaintiff:
Tisheem Rice
Defendant:
AY Auto Credit & Leasing LLC and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Bowser v. Burns Chevrolet Cadillac Inc et al
as 0:2016cv01551
Plaintiff:
Teqoun Q Bowser
Defendant:
Burns Chevrolet Cadillac Inc and John Does 1-10
Counter_claimant:
Burns Chevrolet Cadillac Inc
Counter_defendant:
Teqoun Q Bowser
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Career Counseling, Inc. v. Amsterdam Printing & Litho, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv05061
Plaintiff:
Career Counseling, Inc.
Defendant:
Amsterdam Printing & Litho, Inc., Taylor Corporation and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Environmental Progress Inc v. Campbell et al
as 3:2015cv03128
Plaintiff:
Environmental Progress Inc
Defendant:
Terry M Campbell, Nationwide Mutual Ins Co , Nationwide Insurance Company of America and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Environmental Progress Inc v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
as 3:2012cv02425
Plaintiff:
Environmental Progress Inc
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Storick Group Corporation, The, Storick Group Co, The and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0151
Big Thyme Enterprises Inc v. Palmetto Gold Buying Service Inc et al
as 3:2010cv00573
Plaintiff:
Big Thyme Enterprises Inc
Defendant:
Palmetto Gold Buying Service Inc , Greta Richman and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
