Cases 1 - 10 of 10
PLUMBERS' LOCAL UNION NO. 690 HEALTH PLAN v. ACTAVIS INC. et al
as 2:2016cv00665
Plaintiff:
PLUMBERS' LOCAL UNION NO. 690 HEALTH PLAN
Defendant:
APOTEX CORP. , DR. REDDY'S LABORATORIES LTD., FOREST LABORATORIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: Lorazepam
as 08-5045
In Re:
In re: Lorazepam & Clorazepate Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Federal Trade Commission, State of Florida, By Attorney General Robert A. Butterworth, State of Illinois, By Attorney General James E. Ryan and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Mylan Laboratories, Inc. and Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Defendant - Appellant:
Gyma Laboratories of America, Inc. and Cambrex Corporation
In re: Lorazepam
as 08-5044
In Re:
In re: Lorazepam & Clorazepate Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Federal Trade Commission, State of Florida, By Attorney General Robert A. Butterworth, State of Illinois, By Attorney General James E. Ryan and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Mylan Laboratories, Inc. and Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
Gyma Laboratories of America, Inc. and Cambrex Corporation
MYLAN LABORATORIES, INC. et al v. LEAVITT et al
as 1:2007cv00579
Plaintiff:
MYLAN LABORATORIES, INC. and MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC
Defendant:
MICHAEL O. LEAVITT, ANDREW C. VON ESCHENBACH and UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION
Intervenor Defendant:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., APOTEX INC. and others
Intervenor:
MUTUAL PHARMACEUTICAL CO., INC., MUTUAL PHARMACEUTICAL CO., INC. and MUTUAL PHARMACEUTICAL CO., INC.
Cross Claimant:
APOTEX INC., APOTEX INC., APOTEX INC. and others
Cross Defendant:
UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, MICHAEL O. LEAVITT, ANDREW C. VON ESCHENBACH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
MYLAN LABORATORIES, INC. et al v. LEAVITT et al
as 1:2007cv00571
Plaintiff:
MYLAN LABORATORIES, INC., MYLAN LABORATORIES, INC., MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Defendant:
MICHAEL O. LEAVITT, ANDREW C. VON ESCHENBACH and UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0555 b Agency Decision - Right to Counsel
Oswego, County of v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv10271
Plaintiff:
Oswego, County of
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Inc., Agouron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Agouron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
The County of Erie v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv10282
Plaintiff:
The County of Erie and The County of Erie
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Inc., Abbott Laboratories, Inc., Abbott Laboratories, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
County of Schenectady v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv10273
Plaintiff:
County of Schenectady
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Inc., Agouron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Agouron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Mylan Labs Inc, et al v. Thompson, Tommy G., et al
as 04-5296
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Mylan Laboratories, Inc., Mylan Technologies, Inc. and Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
Tommy G. Thompson, Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Lester M. Crawford, Jr., D.V.M., Ph.D., Acting Commissioner, U.S. Food and Drug Administration and Food & Drug Administration
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee:
Alza Corporation and Janssen Pharmaceutica, Inc.
Amicus Curiae For Appellant:
Generic Pharmaceutical Association
Amicus Curiae For Appellee:
Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America and Candlelighters Childhood Cancer Foundation National Office
United States, ex rel v. Actavis Mid-Atlantic, et al
as 1:2002cv11738
Plaintiff:
United States of America , Constance A. Conrad and Commonwealth of Virginia
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Inc. , Duramed Pharmaceuticals, Inc. , MedPointe, Inc. and others
Movant:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Florida,State of
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
