Cases 1 - 10 of 121
Doe v. T-Mobile USA Inc et al
as 4:2023cv05166
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA Inc and Wireless Vision LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC dba AT&T Mobility v. City of Walla Walla
as 4:2023cv05162
Plaintiff:
New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC doing business as AT&T Mobility and New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC a Delaware limited liability company doing business as AT&T Mobility
Defendant:
City of Walla Walla
Intervenor Defendant:
Barbara Knudson and Everett Knudson
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 332 TELECOMMUNICATIONS ACT
Bennett et al v. T-Mobile USA Inc
as 2:2022cv01805
Plaintiff:
Tara Bennett, David Garcia and Edward Polhill
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc. and T-Mobile USA Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
In re Application of Caterpillar Credito et al
as 2:2022cv01549
Petitioner:
Caterpiller Credito
In Re:
T-Mobile
Interested Party:
Carolina Elizabeth Varady de Bellosta and Carlos Mercelino Jose Bellosta Pallares
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2021cv01180
Plaintiff:
Daniel Simaan
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harper et al v. T-Mobile US Inc
as 2:2021cv01169
Plaintiff:
Michael Harper, Sue Harper, Melanie Jaquess and others
Defendant:
T-Mobile US Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nguyen v. PCH Intelius et al
as 2:2021cv01085
Plaintiff:
George T Nguyen
Defendant:
PCH Intelius and US Banking
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2020cv01737
Defendant:
Chad F Wolf, Kenneth T Cuccinelli, Department of Homeland Security Citizenship & Immigration Services and others
Plaintiff:
Junxia Du
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2020cv01738
Defendant:
Chad F Wolf, Kenneth T Cuccinelli, Department of Homeland Security Citizenship & Immigration Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
