Cases 1 - 10 of 5,009
HURST BOILER & WELDING CO INC v. CCI-KCE LLC
as 7:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
HURST BOILER & WELDING CO INC
Defendant:
CCI-KCE LLC
Nieto v. Moreno
as 1:2024cv02278
Petitioner:
Alvaro Herman Patino Nieto
Respondent:
Liedy Viviana Cardenas Moreno
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11601 International Child Abduction Remedies Act
Abrego v. Garfias
as 1:2024cv02272
Petitioner:
Abel Ortiz Abrego
Respondent:
Lorena Garfias Garfias
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11601 International Child Abduction Remedies Act
Lysa Daniels Tribe et al v. Mozley, Finlayson & Loggins LLP et al
as 1:2024mi00038
Plaintiff:
Lysa Daniels Tribe and Alyssa Daniels
Defendant:
Mozley, Finlayson & Loggins LLP, Lakeview Loan Servicing, LLC and M&T Bank, Legal Document Processing
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 No Cause Specified
Kompan A/S et al. v. Bliss Products and Services, Inc.
as 1:2024mi00039
Respondent:
Bliss Products and Services, Inc.
Petitioner:
Kompan A/S and Kompan, Inc.
Hess v. American International Industries
as 1:2024cv02195
Respondent:
American International Industries
Petitioner:
Paul Hess and Material Analytical Services, LLC
Pinnacle Coating & Converting, Inc. v. S. Walter Packaging Corp.
as 1:2024mi00037
Plaintiff:
Pinnacle Coating & Converting, Inc.
Defendant:
S. Walter Packaging Corp.
Petitioner:
Beaver Paper and Graphic Media, Inc.
Regions Bank v. Roth
as 2:2024mi00002
Plaintiff:
Regions Bank
Defendant:
Steven A. Roth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1963 Registration of judgment from another district
Regions Bank v. Roth
as 2:2024mi00001
Plaintiff:
Regions Bank
Defendant:
Steven A. Roth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1963 Registration of judgment from another district
TUCKER v. HARRIS et al
as 4:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
READERLYNN CARTER TUCKER
Defendant:
MARK HARRIS, ALETHEA HARRIS, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
