Cases 1 - 5 of 5
4M Fruit Distributors, Inc. et al v. Lord Ganeshji, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv11655
Defendant:
Anil Kumar, Lord Ganeshji, Inc., Vishal Ghai and others
Plaintiff:
Boston Tomato & Packaging, LLC, Peter Condakes Company, Inc., S. Strock & Co., Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
Coosemans Boston, Inc. et al v. Paoletti's Fruit Store, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv10097
Plaintiff:
Coosemans Boston, Inc. , Garden Fresh Salad Co., Inc. , Gold Bell, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Paoletti's Fruit Store, Inc., Robert R. Tiberii, William P. Tiberii and others
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
Boston Tomato & Packaging, LLC, et al. v. Bostonia Produce, Inc., et al.
as 1:2012cv11865
Plaintiff:
Boston Tomato & Packaging, LLC , Lisitano Produce Inc. , John Cerasuolo Co., Inc. and others
Defendant:
Bostonia Produce, Inc. , Steven Splagounias and Nikitas Splagounias
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Demetrios Vardakostas
Claimant:
P. Tavilla Co., Inc., Arthur G. Silk, Inc. and Idaho Freez Pak
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Garden Frsh Salad Co. Inc. , Coosemans Boston Inc. , Hop Hing Produces, Inc. and others
Thirdparty_defendant:
Bostonia Produce, Inc. , Nikitas Splagounias and Steven Splagounias
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499 Agricultural Commodities Act
B.C. Produce, Inc. et al v. Lowell Bros. & Bailey, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv10794
Plaintiff:
B.C. Produce, Inc. , Boston Tomato & Packaging, LLC , Coosemans Boston, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Lowell Bros. & Bailey, Inc., Andrew C. Sexeny and George E. Sexeny
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
4M Fruit Distributors, Inc. et al v. Arillotta et al
as 1:2007cv11090
Plaintiff:
4M Fruit Distributors, Inc., Apples Plus, Inc., B&R Produce Packing Co., Inc. and others
Defendant:
Loretta A. Arillotta, Dominick J. Arillotta, Loretta A. Arillotta and others
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499 Agricultural Commodities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
