Cases 41 - 46 of 46
CONSERVATION FORCE et al v. SALAZAR et al
as 1:2011cv02008
Plaintiff:
CONSERVATION FORCE , STEVE HORNADY , BARBARA LEE SACKMAN and others
Defendant:
KEN SALAZAR, DAN ASHE and U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Center for Biological Diversity v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service et al
as 3:2011cv05108
Plaintiff:
Center for Biological Diversity
Defendant:
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service , Dan Ashe , Environmental Protection Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Center for Biological Diversity et al v. U.S. Department of State et al
as 8:2011cv00345
Defendant:
Director Dan Ashe, Secretary Hillary Clinton, Rural Utilities Service and others
Plaintiff:
Center for Biological Diversity, Friends of the Earth and Western Nebraska Resources Council
Intervenor Defendant:
TransCanada Corporation and TransCanada Keystone Pipeline, LP
Cause Of Action: 30 U.S.C. § 1201 Environment: Review of Agency Action
Counsel for Endangered Species Act Reliability v. Kenneth Lee Salazar, et al
as 2:2011cv02511
Defendant:
Kenneth Lee Salazar, Dan Ashe, Renne Lohoefener and others
Plaintiff:
Council For Endangered Species Act Reliability
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
Counsel for Endangered Species Act Reliability v. Kenneth Lee Salazar, et al
as 2:2011at01355
Defendant:
Kenneth Lee Salazar, Dan Ashe and Renne Lohoefener
Plaintiff:
The Council For Endangered Species Act Reliability
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Center for Biological Diversit, et al v. Kenneth Salazar, et al
as 11-16840
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and MARICOPA AUDOBON SOCIETY
Defendant - Appellant:
KENNETH SALAZAR, in his official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Interior, BENJAMIN TUGGLE, in his official capacity as Regional Director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, DAN ASHE, in his capacity as Director of the U.S. fish and Wildlife Service and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
