Environmental Matters Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 111
Catskill Mountains Chapter of v. United States Environmental Pr
as 14-2016
Plaintiff: Catskill Mountains Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Inc., Theodore Gordon Flyfishers, Inc., Catskill-Deleware Natural Water Alliance, Inc. and others
Plaintiff - Appellee: Government of the Province of Manitoba, Canada
Defendant: State of Texas, State of Alaska, State of Idaho and others
Defendant - Appellee: States of Colorado, New Mexico, et al., Central Arizona Water Conservation District, City and County of San Francisco Public Utilities Commission and others
Defendant - Appellant: South Florida Water Management District
Catskill Mountains Chapter of v. United States Environmental Pr
as 14-1909
Plaintiff - Appellee: Catskill Mountains Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Inc., Theodore Gordon Flyfishers, Inc., Catskill-Deleware Natural Water Alliance, Inc. and others
Defendant: United States Environmental Protection Agency, Stephen L. Johnson, in his official capacity as ADMINISTRATOR OF THE UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, City of New York and others
Defendant - Appellant: Central Arizona Water Conservation District, City and County of Denver, by and through its Board of Water Commissioners, Central Utah Water Conservancy District and others
Catskill Mountains Chapter of v. United States Environmental Pr We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-1823
Plaintiff - Appellee: Catskill Mountains Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Inc., Theodore Gordon Flyfishers, Inc., Catskill-Deleware Natural Water Alliance, Inc. and others
Defendant: State of Texas, State of Alaska, State of Idaho and others
Defendant - Appellant: Stephen L. Johnson, in his official capacity as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency and South Florida Water Management District
Defendant - Appellant-Cross-Appellee: States of Colorado, New Mexico, et al., Central Arizona Water Conservation District, City and County of San Francisco Public Utilities Commission and others
San Francisco Baykeeper v. Pacific Rim Recycling, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv01100
Plaintiff: San Francisco Baykeeper
Defendant: Pacific Rim Recycling, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Pacific Coast Federation of Fi, et al v. United States Department of th, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-15514
Plaintiff - Appellant: PACIFIC COAST FEDERATION OF FISHERMEN'S ASSOCIATIONS and SAN FRANCISCO CRAB BOAT OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and UNITED STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee: WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT, SAN LUIS WATER DISTRICT and PANOCHE WATER DISTRICT
San Francisco Baykeeper v. Syar Industries Inc We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv00779
Plaintiff: San Francisco Baykeeper
Defendant: Syar Industries Inc
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319
San Francisco Baykeeper v. Marine Express, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv05550
Plaintiff: San Francisco Baykeeper
Defendant: Marine Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
San Francisco Baykeeper v. Pacific Galvanizing We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv05260
Plaintiff: San Francisco Baykeeper
Defendant: Pacific Galvanizing
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
San Francisco Baykeeper v. Oldcastle Precast, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2013cv05153
Plaintiff: San Francisco Baykeeper
Defendant: Oldcastle Precast, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319
San Francisco Baykeeper v. City of Sunnyvale et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2013cv02425
Plaintiff: San Francisco Baykeeper
Defendant: City of Sunnyvale, Bay Counties Waste Services, Inc. and Stevens Creek Quarry, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?