Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Battle Creek Alliance v. Sierra Pacific Industries
as 2:2016cv01621
Defendant:
Sierra Pacific Industries, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Battle Creek Alliance
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319
Battle Creek Alliance v. Sierra Pacific Industries
as 2:2016at00838
Defendant:
Sierra Pacific Industries
Plaintiff:
Battle Creek Alliance
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319
Battle Creek Alliance v. Sierra Pacific Industries, Inc.
as 1:2016cv03778
Plaintiff:
Battle Creek Alliance
Defendant:
Sierra Pacific Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319
Battle Creek Alliance v. Sierra Pacific Industries, Inc.
as 2:2016cv01503
Defendant:
Sierra Pacific Industries, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Battle Creek Alliance
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319
Te-Moak Tribe of Western Shosh, et al v. DOI, et al
as 12-15412
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TE-MOAK TRIBE OF WESTERN SHOSHONE INDIANS OF NEVADA, TIMBISHA SHOSHONE TRIBE, WESTERN SHOSHONE DEFENSE PROJECT and others
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT and GERALD M. SMITH, District Manager, Battle Mountain Field Office
Defendant-intervenor - Appellee:
BARRICK CORTEZ, INC.
United States Of America et al v. Airgas Carbonic, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00163
Defendant:
Coca-Cola USA, Vital Pharma, Inc, ABC Compounding Company, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
United States Of America and State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
South Fork Band Council of We, et al v. DOI, et al
as 09-15230
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SOUTH FORK BAND COUNCIL OF WESTERN SHOSHONE OF NEVADA, TE-MOAK TRIBE OF WESTERN SHOSHONE INDIANS OF NEVADA, TIMBISHA SHOSHONE TRIBE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT and GERALD M. SMITH, District Manager, Battle Mountain Field Office
Defendant-intervenor - Appellee:
BARRICK CORTEZ, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
