Cases 1 - 7 of 7
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. WEAVER
as 3:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DWIGHT J. WEAVER agent of d/b/a D.W. Hardwoods Company
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
Idaho Conservation League v. Ness et al
as 1:2017cv00081
Plaintiff:
Idaho Conservation League
Defendant:
Brian Ness, Jerry Whitehead, R. James Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
USA, et al v. Walker River Irrigation Distri, et al
as 15-16478
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Intervenor-Plaintiff:
WALKER RIVER PAIUTE TRIBE
Defendant - Appellee:
WALKER RIVER IRRIGATION DISTRICT, ESTATE OF HERBERT GARMS, et al., CIRCLE BAR N RANCH, L.L.C., et al. and others
v. Meddock et al
as 2:2011at01819
Defendant:
Dwight Meddock , Glen A Barton, Gloria L Barton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Barton et al v. Meddock et al
as 2:2011cv03349
Defendant:
Dwight Meddock , Kay Meddock , Meddock & Sons, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Glen A. Barton and Gloria L. Barton
Cross_claimant:
Meddock & Sons, Inc. , Dwight Meddock and Kay Meddock
Cross_defendant:
David Chinn and Michael Lim
Counter_claimant:
Meddock & Sons, Inc. , Dwight Meddock and Kay Meddock
Counter_defendant:
Glen A. Barton and Gloria L. Barton
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Dwight Meddock , Meddock & Sons, Inc. and Kay Meddock
Thirdparty_defendant:
Terry Castro, William Engalls, Eric Meyers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
McCormick et al v. Halliburton Company et al
as 5:2011cv01272
Plaintiff:
Mitchell McCormick , Sonja McCormick , Dwight Sanford and others
Defendant:
Halliburton Company and Halliburton Energy Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901
Burrows et al v. Perry et al
as 3:2007cv05354
Plaintiff:
Bruce A. Burrows and James A. Roessler
Defendant:
Dwight W. Perry, Carlton L. Perry, Kwang Suk Lee and others
Cause Of Action: CERCLA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
