Cases 1 - 10 of 15
EL PASO WATER UTILITIES - PUBLIC SERVICE BOARD, for and on behalf of the City of El Paso, Texas, a Texas municipal corporation v. JAMES C. KENNEY, in his official capacity as Cabinet Secretary of the NEW MEXICO ENVIRONMENT DEPARTMENT et al
as 3:2022cv00460
Plaintiff:
EL PASO WATER UTILITIES - PUBLIC SERVICE BOARD, for and on behalf of the City of El Paso, Texas, a Texas municipal corporation
Defendant:
JAMES C. KENNEY, in his official capacity as Cabinet Secretary of the NEW MEXICO ENVIRONMENT DEPARTMENT, JOHN RHODERICK, in his official capacity as Water Protection Division Acting Director of the NEW MEXICO ENVIRONMENT DEPARTMENT, WILLIAM BRANCARD, KEITH CANDELARIA, LARRY DOMINGUEZ, KRISTA McWILLIAMS, PURVI MODY, KATIE ZEMLICK, KIRK PATTEN, KELSEY RADER, DAVID SYPHER, BONNIE FREY, BRUCE THOMSON, TOBY VELASQUEZ and EDWARD VIGIL, and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
United States v. Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations LLC et al
as 3:2018cv00054
Plaintiff:
United States
Defendant:
Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations LLC , Cargill Inc , Flowserve Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Aikwig et al v. Michelin North America, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv00326
Plaintiff:
Amber Aikwig , Mary Ball , William Baron and others
Defendant:
Michelin North America, Inc. and B.F. Goodrich Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Atlantic Richfield Company v. Gregory Christian, et al
as 17-35188
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY, a Delaware corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
GREGORY A. CHRISTIAN, MICHELLE D. CHRISTIAN, ROSEMARY CHOQUETTE and others
Atlantic Richfield Company v. Christian et al
as 2:2015cv00083
Plaintiff:
Atlantic Richfield Company
Defendant:
Gregory A. Christian, Michelle D. Christian, Rosemary Choquette and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Everett et al v. Tram Chemicals, Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv03451
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Everett , Mike Kowis , Michael James Kowis and others
Defendant:
Tram Chemicals, Inc., Walden Environmental Chemistries, Inc., Walden Performance Products, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901
Hobart Corporation et al v. The Dayton Power and Light Company et al
as 3:2013cv00115
Cross Claimant:
Pharmacia LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company and Dayton Power and Light Company
Counter Claimant:
Standard Register Company, Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations LLC, Valley Asphalt Corporation and others
Defendant:
Dayton Industrial Drum, Inc., PPG Industries, Inc., Waste Management of Ohio, Inc. and others
Cross Defendant:
United States Department of Defense, Sherwin-Williams Company, "John Doe" Corporation(s) and others
Counter Defendant:
Harris Corporation, Franklin Iron & Metal Corp, City of Dayton, Ohio and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Ronald H. Barnett, Dryden Road Investments, LLC, South Dayton Land Fill Remediation Trust and others
Plaintiff:
Hobart Corporation and Kelsey-Hayes Company doing business as ZF Active Safety US Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses
Hobart Corporation, et al v. Coca-Cola Enterprises, Inc., et al
as 13-3362
Plaintiff - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
HOBART CORPORATION, KELSEY-HAYES COMPANY and NCR CORPORATION
Defendant:
COCA-COLA ENTERPRISES, INC., GLAXSOSMITHKLINE, LLC and THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY
Defendant - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
DAP PRODUCTS, INC.
Hobart Corporation, et al v. Coca-Cola Enterprises, Inc., et al
as 13-3276
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HOBART CORPORATION, KELSEY-HAYES COMPANY and NCR CORPORATION
Defendant - Appellee:
COCA-COLA ENTERPRISES, INC., DAP PRODUCTS, INC., GLAXSOSMITHKLINE, LLC and others
Hobart Corporation, et al v. Waste Management of Ohio, Inc., et al
as 13-3273
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HOBART CORPORATION, KELSEY-HAYES COMPANY and NCR CORPORATION
Defendant - Appellee:
WASTE MANAGEMENT OF OHIO, INC., as successor to Industrial Waste Disposal Co., Inc., BRIDGESTONE FIRESTONE INC, fka Dayton Tire and Rubber Company, CARGILL INC. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
