Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Tailored Chemical Products, Inc. v. DAFCO Inc. et al
as 5:2021cv00069
Defendant:
Brenntag Mid-South, Inc., Anderson Family Properties, LLC, Perry R. Keister and others
Plaintiff:
Tailored Chemical Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS, LLC
as 1:2019cv00707
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, SECRETARY OF NATURAL RESOURCES and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
Rose Acre Farms, Inc. v. North Carolina Department of Environment & Natural Resources et al
as 5:2014cv00147
Plaintiff:
Rose Acre Farms, Inc.
Defendant:
North Carolina Department of Environment & Natural Resources, John E. Skvarla and Tom Reeder
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319
Red Wolf Coalition et al v. North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission et al
as 2:2013cv00060
Plaintiff:
Red Wolf Coalition , Defenders of Wildlife and Animal Welfare Institute
Defendant:
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission , Jim Cogdell , John Litton Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538
Southern Alliance for Clean Energy et al v. Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC
as 1:2008cv00318
Plaintiff:
Southern Alliance for Clean Energy, Environmental Defense Fund, National Parks Conservation Association and others
Defendant:
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. Albemarle Electric Membership Corporation et al
as 5:2008cv00261
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, ex rel., WILLIAM G. ROSS, JR., SECRETARY, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT & NATURAL RESOURCES
Defendant:
Albermarle Electric Membership Corporation, Berkeley Electric Cooperative, Inc., Black River Electric Cooperative, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
