Cases 11 - 16 of 16
Robert Rawson v. State of Ohio, et al
as 17-12361
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT DAVID RAWSON, a person
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF OHIO, STATE OF FLORIDA, STATE OF MICHIGAN and others
Fundamental Admin. Services, et al v. Cohen, et al
as 17-2025
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FUNDAMENTAL ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, LLC and FUNDAMENTAL CLINICAL CONSULTING, LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
SETH T. COHEN, as Personal Representative for the estate of Tessie Hammnn, deceased and VICKI MONTANO
Harper, et al v. C.R. England
as 17-4008
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MILTON HARPER, individuals, on behalf of themselves, and on behalf of all persons similarly situated, RONNIE STEVENSON, individuals, on behalf of themselves, and on behalf of all persons similarly situated and JONATHAN MITCHELL, individuals, on behalf of themselves, and on behalf of all persons similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
C.R. ENGLAND, INC., a corporation
Movant - Appellant:
WILLIAM H. GRADIE, SANG LEE, WILLIAM BORSCHOWA and others
Brandenburg Health Facilities, et al v. Ivye Mattingly
as 16-6168
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BRANDENBURG HEALTH FACILITIES, LP, dba Brandenburg Nursing & Rehabilitation Center, PREFERRED CARE, INC. and KENTUCKY PARTNERS MANAGEMENT, LLC
Defendant - Appellant:
IVYE MATTINGLY, as Administratrix of the Estate of Mary Jo Hancock, an Incapacitated Person
Shalov v. Ladah et al
as 2:2015cv00773
Defendant:
Ramzy P. Ladah, Ladah Law Firm, PLLC and Las Vegas Personal Injury, LLC
Plaintiff:
Susan Shalov
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Tough Mudder, LLC v. Mita Sengupta
as 14-2200
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TOUGH MUDDER, LLC, PEACEMAKER NATIONAL TRAINING CENTER, LLC, GENERAL MILLS, INC. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MITA SENGUPTA, Individually and as Personal Representative of Avishek Sengupta, BIJON SENGUPTA and PRIYANKA SENGUPTA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
