Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Crystallee Ramos v. Sergio Alvarez, et al
as 22-13117
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CRYSTALLEE RAMOS
Defendant / Appellant:
SERGIO ALVAREZ, ALVAREZ PLASTIC SURGERY, PLLC and MIA AESTHETICS CLINICS, LLC
Diana Ortiz v. Sergio Alvarez, et al
as 22-13101
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DIANA ORTIZ
Defendant / Appellant:
SERGIO ALVAREZ, ALVAREZ PLASTIC SURGERY, PLLC and MIA AESTHETICS CLINICS, LLC
Ramos v. Alvarez et al
as 1:2022cv21619
Plaintiff:
Crystallee Ramos
Defendant:
Sergio Alvarez, Alvarez Plastic Surgery, PLLC and Mia Aesthetics Clinics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Ortiz v. Alvarez et al
as 1:2022cv21617
Plaintiff:
Ms. Diana Ortiz
Defendant:
Dr. Sergio Alvarez, Alvarez Plastic Surgery, PLLC and Mia Aesthetics Clinics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0185 Suit to Compel Arbitration
v. Ramos et al
as 1:2022cv21618
Defendant:
Crystallee Ramos, Dr. Sergio Alvarez, Alvarez Plastic Surgery, PLLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0185 Suit to Compel Arbitration
Abernathy et al v. Doordash, Inc.
as 3:2019cv07545
Respondent:
Doordash, Inc.
Petitioner:
Malik Abdulhaqq, Terrell Abernathy, Parisa Aalami and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
International Institute for Conflict Prevention and Resolution, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 185 Suit to Compel Arbitration
Santos Saul Alvarez Barragan et al v. DAZN North America Inc., et al
as 2:2020cv09277
Plaintiff:
SA Holiday, Inc and Santos Saul Alvarez Barragan
Defendant:
Golden Boy Promotions LLC, DAZN NORTH AMERICA INC., Golden Boy Promotions Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SBM Site Services, LLC v. Alvarez
as 4:2017cv03028
Defendant:
Raul Alvarez
Plaintiff:
SBM Site Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Nunez et al v. American Airlines, Inc.
as 1:2016cv22124
Plaintiff:
Reinaldo Acosta Vega, Jr., Carlos Alvarez, Fernando Antonetti and others
Defendant:
American Airlines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0009
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
