Cases 161 - 170 of 175
GRIMES v. COLVIN
as 1:2014cv00891
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH P. GRIMES
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
ELGHAZALY v. RODRIGUEZ, et al.
as 1:2014cv00798
Plaintiff:
AHMED ELGHAZALY
Defendant:
LEON RODRIGUEZ and JEFF SAPKO
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Nieves v. McHugh
as 5:2014cv00434
Plaintiff:
Neftali Rivera Nieves
Defendant:
John M. McHugh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
INTERNATIONAL LABOR MANAGEMENT CORPORATION v. PEREZ et al
as 1:2014cv00231
Plaintiff:
INTERNATIONAL LABOR MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
Defendant:
THOMAS E. PEREZ and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Duke Energy Progress, Inc. v. National Marine Fisheries Service et al
as 3:2013cv00706
Plaintiff:
Duke Energy Progress, Inc.
Defendant:
National Marine Fisheries Service , United States Department of Commerce , Penny Pritzker and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
White v. Colvin
as 5:2013cv00757
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Lawrence White
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4208
Weber et al v. Woods et al
as 1:2013cv00263
Plaintiff:
Lorna Weber and Parkway Inn, Inc.
Defendant:
Mark Woods , Johnathan B. Jarvis and National Park Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
BLACK v. THE UNITED STATES ARMY et al
as 1:2013cv00889
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM REID BLACK
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES ARMY, ARMY REVIEW BOARD AGENCY, PULSON and others
Cause Of Action: 10 U.S.C. § 1552
MOXLEY v. COLVIN
as 1:2013cv00460
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANTHONY MOXLEY
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
RANKIN v. COLVIN
as 1:2013cv00344
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Plaintiff:
LYNN B. RANKIN
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 3373 Appeal of Decision - DOI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
