Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Dalton, et al v. Biden, et al
as 23-4107
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ZEBEDIAH GEORGE DALTON, BLUERIBBON COALITION, KYLE KIMMERLE and others
Plaintiff:
GARFIELD COUNTY, UTAH, a Utah political subdivision, KANE COUNTY, UTAH, a Utah political subdivision, THE STATE OF UTAH and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., in his official capacity as President of the United States, DEB HAALAND, in her official capacity as Secretary of Interior, THE DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
HOPI TRIBE, NAVAJO NATION, PUEBLO OF ZUNI and others
Petitioner:
GRAND STAIRCASE ESCALANTE PARTNERS, SOCIETY OF VERTEBRATE PALEONTOLOGY, CONSERVATION LANDS FOUNDATION, INC. and others
NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN THE UNITED STATES et al v. BUTTIGIEG et al
as 2:2023cv00080
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN THE UNITED STATES, FRIENDS OF THE FRANK J WOOD BRIDGE, HISTORIC BRIDGE FOUNDATION and others
Defendant:
PETE BUTTIGIEG, SHAILEN BHATT, TODD JORGENSEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Garfield County et al v. Biden et al
as 4:2022cv00059
Plaintiff:
Garfield County, Kane County, State of Utah and others
Defendant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., Deb Haaland, Department of the Interior and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Zebediah George Dalton, BlueRibbon Coalition, Kyle Kimmerle and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Navajo Nation, Hopi Tribe, Ute Mountain Ute Tribe and others
Petitioner:
National Parks Conservation Association, Wilderness Society, Grand Canyon Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
HISTORIC BRIDGE FOUNDATION et al v. CHAO et al
as 2:2019cv00408
Defendant:
BRUCE VAN NOTE, ELAINE CHAO, NICOLE R NASEN and others
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN THE UNITED STATES, HISTORIC BRIDGE FOUNDATION and FRIENDS OF THE FRANK J. WOOD BRIDGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
