Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
DINAPOLI et al v. BECERRA et al
as 1:2023cv01799
Plaintiff: ANGELA DINAPOLI, ANGGIA HAJAR, ARCELIA BROWN and others
Petitioner: CYNTHIA MORRIS
Defendant: XAVIER BECERRA, US DEPARTMENT OF HEALTHAND HUMAN SERVICES, HEALTH RESOURCES AND SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, COUNTERMEASURES INJURY COMPENSATION PROGRAM, US DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAD SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, et al v. Gina Raimondo, et al
as 22-5267
Plaintiff / Appellant: Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, Matt Campbell, Diana Hetzel and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: Barbara Krukowski-Rastelli and William Prevatel, AIA
Defendant / Appellee: Gina Raimondo, in her official capacity as Secretary of Commerce, James Olthoff, Dr.; in his official capacity as Director of the National Institute for Standards and Technology, National Institute of Standards and Technology and others
Julia Cavazos, et al v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 22-5084
Plaintiff / Appellant: Julia Cavazos, Nancy Cisneros, Debra Cicalo and others
Defendant / Appellee: Debra A. Haaland, in her Official Capacity as Secretary of the Interior, Bryan Newland, in his Official Capacity as Assistant Secretary for Indian Affairs of the Department of the Interior and Darryl LaCounte, in his Official Capacity as Director of the Bureau of Indian Affairs
Intervenor / Appellee: Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe of Michigan
Julia Cavazos, et al v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 22-5061
Plaintiff / Appellee: Julia Cavazos, Nancy Cisneros, Debra Cicalo and others
Defendant / Appellant: Debra A. Haaland, in her Official Capacity as Secretary of the Interior, Bryan Newland, in his Official Capacity as Assistant Secretary for Indian Affairs of the Department of the Interior and Darryl LaCounte, in his Official Capacity as Director of the Bureau of Indian Affairs
Intervenor / Appellee: Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe of Michigan
BOU JABBOUR et al v. BLINKEN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00451
Plaintiff: PAUL BOU JABBOUR, RAMESH ADHIKARI, SUREN AKHVERDYAN and others
Defendant: ANTHONY BLINKEN, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, AMERICAN INSTITUTE IN TAIWAN and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
ALTSCHULD et al v. RAIMONDO et al
as 1:2021cv02779
Plaintiff: DAN ET AL ALTSCHULD, DAN ALTSCHULD, MARK S AMATO and others
Not Classified By Court: LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III, MERRICK B. GARLAND, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and others
Defendant: Secretary GINA M. RAIMONDO and GINA M. RAIMONDO
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
ARCHITECTS & ENGINEERS FOR 9/11 TRUTH et al v. RAIMONDO et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv02365
Plaintiff: ARCHITECTS & ENGINEERS FOR 9/11 TRUTH, ROBERT MCILVAINE, MATT CAMPBELL and others
Defendant: Secretary GINA M. RAIMONDO, Dr. JAMES OLTHOFF, NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
CAVAZOS et al v. BERNHARDT et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv02942
Plaintiff: ESTATE OF DOLORES HERNANDEZ, ESTATE OF ANDY SHULER, CELESTE HAMNER and others
Defendant: TARA SWEENEY, DARRYL LACOUNTE and DAVID BERNHARDT
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
LAS AMERICAS IMMIGRANT ADVOCACY CENTER v. WOLF et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv03640
Plaintiff: LAS AMERICAS IMMIGRANT ADVOCACY CENTER, B.G.R., K.M.V. and others
Defendant: CHAD WOLF, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI and others
Petitioner: AMERICAN IMMIGRATION COUNCIL, AMERICAN IMMIGRATION LAWYERS ASSOCIATION, INNOVATION LAW LAB and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Huff et al v. Vilsack
as 2:2015cv00700
Defendant: Tom Vilsack
Plaintiff: John T. Huff, Jr. , Huff Management Co., Inc. , Alex City Parkway Apartments, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?