Constitutionality of State Statutes Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 65
John Doe #1, et al v. Sam Reed, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-35854
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOHN DOE #1, an individual, JOHN DOE #2, an individual and PROTECT MARRIAGE WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellee: SAM REED, in his official capacity as Secretary of State of Washington and BRENDA GALARZA, in her official capacity as Public records Officer for the Secretary of State of Washington
Georgia Latino Alliance for Human Rights et al v. Deal et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv01804
Plaintiff: Georgia Latino Alliance for Human Rights , Service Employees International Union , Southern Regional Joint Board of Workers' United and others
Defendant: Nathan Deal , Samuel S. Olens , Clyde L. Reese, III and others
Amicu: ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE , United Mexican States , Argentina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
American Promotional Events, Inc.-Northwest v. City and County of Honolulu et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00242
Plaintiff: American Promotional Events, Inc.-Northwest
Defendant: City and County of Honolulu , John Does 1-10, Jane Does 1-10 and others
Counter_claimant: City and County of Honolulu
Counter_defendant: American Promotional Events, Inc.-Northwest
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
State of Hawaii v. Peabody et al
as 1:2011cv00069
Defendant: George Gary Peabody, John Does 1-20, Doe Corporations 1-20 and others
Plaintiff: State of Hawaii
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Bryan v. Mount Olive Shores North Homeowners Association, Inc. et al
as 8:2010cv01103
Plaintiff: Pearl Lanier Bryan
Defendant: Mount Olive Shores North Homeowners Association, Inc., Ronald F. Lilly, Paul T. Hinckley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
John Doe #1, et al v. Washington Families Standing T, et al
as 09-35863
Plaintiff - Appellee: JOHN DOE #1, an individual, JOHN DOE #2, an individual and PROTECT MARRIAGE WASHINGTON
Intervenor - Appellant: WASHINGTON FAMILIES STANDING TOGETHER
Defendant: SAM REED, in his official capacity as Secretary of State of Washington and BRENDA GALARZA, in her official capacity as Public records Officer for the Secretary of State of Washington
John Doe #1, et al v. Arthur West
as 09-35832
Plaintiff - Appellee: JOHN DOE #1, an individual, JOHN DOE #2, an individual and PROTECT MARRIAGE WASHINGTON
Appellant: ARTHUR SCOTT WEST, I
Defendant: SAM REED, in his official capacity as Secretary of State of Washington and BRENDA GALARZA, in her official capacity as Public records Officer for the Secretary of State of Washington
John Doe #1, et al v. Washington Coalition for Open, et al
as 09-35826
Plaintiff - Appellee: JOHN DOE #1, an individual, JOHN DOE #2, an individual and PROTECT MARRIAGE WASHINGTON
Defendant: SAM REED, in his official capacity as Secretary of State of Washington and BRENDA GALARZA, in her official capacity as Public records Officer for the Secretary of State of Washington
Defendant-intervenor - Appellant: WASHINGTON COALITION FOR OPEN GOVERNMENT
: AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF WASHINGTON
John Doe #1, et al v. Sam Reed, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-35818
Plaintiff - Appellee: JOHN DOE #1, an individual, JOHN DOE #2, an individual and PROTECT MARRIAGE WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellant: SAM REED, in his official capacity as Secretary of State of Washington and BRENDA GALARZA, in her official capacity as Public records Officer for the Secretary of State of Washington
: AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF WASHINGTON
John Doe #1 et al v. Reed et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv05456
Plaintiff: John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and Protect Marriage Washington
Defendant: Sam Reed and Debra Galarza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Type: Other Statutes None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?