Constitutionality of State Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 74
National Association for Gun Rights, et al v. Polis
as 24-1209
Plaintiff: NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR GUN RIGHTS, CHRISTOPHER JAMES HIESTAND RICHARDSON, MAX EDWIN SCHLOSSER and others
Defendant: JARED POLIS, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Colorado,
Alliance of Health Care Sharing Ministries v. Colorado Division of Insurance et al
as 1:2024cv01386
Plaintiff: Alliance of Health Care Sharing Ministries
Defendant: Colorado Division of Insurance and Michael Conway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Molo v. Board of County Commissioners of the County of Pitkin, The et al
as 1:2024cv00973
Plaintiff: The Colorado Max RE Trust II Acting By, Through, and With Its Trustee, Steven Molo and Steven Molo
Defendant: The Board of County Commissioners of the County of Pitkin of the State of Colorado, Patti Clapper, Francie Jacober and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 dj - Fed. Question - Declaratory Judgment
Amgen Inc. v. Colorado Prescription Drug Affordability Review Board et al
as 1:2024cv00810
Plaintiff: Amgen Inc., Immunex Corporation and Amgen Manufacturing, Limited
Defendant: Colorado Prescription Drug Affordability Review Board, Gail Mizner, Sami Diab and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2403 - Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Teva Pharmaceuticals v. Weiser, et al
as 24-1035
Plaintiff: TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC.
Defendant: PHILIP J. WEISER, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Colorado, PATRICIA A. EVACKO, ERIC FRAZER and others
Poe, et al v. Drummond, et al
as 23-5110
Plaintiff / Appellant: PETER POE, by and through his parents and next friends, Paula Poe and Patrick Poe, PAULA POE, PATRICK POE and others
Plaintiff: DR. SHAUNA LAWLIS, on behalf of her patients
Defendant / Appellee: GENTNER F DRUMMOND, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma, STEVEN KATSIS, M.D., in his official capacity as President of the Oklahoma State Board of Medical Licensure and Supervision, TREVOR NUTT, in his official capacity as Vice-President of the Oklahoma State Board of Medical Licensure and Supervision and others
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF CONNECTICUT and others
Colorado Republican Party v. Griswold We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv01948
Plaintiff: Colorado Republican Party
Defendant: Secretary of State Jena Griswold and Jena Griswold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lana Renna, et al v. Rob Bonta, et al
as 23-55367
Plaintiff / Appellee: LANA RAE RENNA, DANIELLE JAYMES, HANNAH SPOUSTA and others
Defendant / Appellant: ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of California and ALLISON MENDOZA, in her official capacity as Director of Department of Justice Bureau of Firearms
Amicus Curiae: BRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, THE STATES OF COLORADO, CONNECTICUT, DELAWARE, HAWAII, ILLINOIS, MARYLAND, MASSACHUSETTS, MICHIGAN, MINNESOTA, NEW JERSEY, NEW YORK, OREGON, PENNSYLVANIA, and RHODE ISLAND, EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY and others
Lance Boland, et al v. Rob Bonta, et al
as 23-55276
Plaintiff / Appellee: LANCE BOLAND, an individual, MARIO SANTELLAN, an individual, RENO MAY, an individual and others
Defendant / Appellant: ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California
Defendant: DOES, 1-10
Amicus Curiae: BRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, STATES OF COLORADO, CONNECTICUT, DELAWARE, HAWAII, ILLINOIS, MASSACHUSETTS, MICHIGAN, MINNESOTA, NEW JERSEY, NEW YORK, OREGON, PENNSYLVANIA, and RHODE ISLAND and others
State of Montana et al v. City of Portland
as 3:2023cv00219
Plaintiff: State of Montana, WESTERN ENERGY ALLIANCE, a Colorado nonprofit corporation, PACIFIC PROPANE GAS ASSOCIATION, a Washington nonprofit corporation and others
Defendant: City of Portland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?