Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Hawaiian Kingdom v. Joseph Biden, et al
as 22-15637
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HAWAIIAN KINGDOM
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, in his official capacity as President of the United States, KAMALA D. HARRIS, in her official capacity as Vice-President and President of the United States Senate, JOHN AQUILINO, Admiral; in his official capacity as Commander, U.S. Indo-Pacific Command and others
Rocky Mountain Farmers Union, et al v. Richard Corey, et al
as 17-16882
Plaintiff:
ROCKY MOUNTAIN FARMERS UNION, REDWOOD COUNTY MINNESOTA CORN AND SOYBEAN GROWERS, PENNY NEWMAN GRAIN, INC. and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AMERICAN FUEL & PETROCHEMICAL MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION, FKA National Petrochemical & Refiners Association, AMERICAN TRUCKINGS ASSOCIATIONS and THE CONSUMER ENERGY ALLIANCE
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD W COREY, in his official capacity as Executive Officer of the California Air Resources Board, ALEXANDER SHERRIFFS, BARBARA RIORDAN and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
SIERRA CLUB, CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION, ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND and others
Rocky Mountain Farmers Union, et al v. Richard Corey, et al
as 17-16881
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROCKY MOUNTAIN FARMERS UNION, REDWOOD COUNTY MINNESOTA CORN AND SOYBEAN GROWERS, PENNY NEWMAN GRAIN, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN FUEL & PETROCHEMICAL MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION, FKA National Petrochemical & Refiners Association, AMERICAN TRUCKINGS ASSOCIATIONS and THE CONSUMER ENERGY ALLIANCE
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD W COREY, in his official capacity as Executive Officer of the California Air Resources Board, ALEXANDER SHERRIFFS, BARBARA RIORDAN and others
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
SIERRA CLUB, CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION, ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND and others
Unico Mechanical Corp., et al v. Kamala Harris, et al
as 17-15094
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNICO MECHANICAL CORP., a California corporation and ALFRED CONHAGEN, INC. OF CALIFORNIA, a California corporation
Defendant / Appellee:
KAMALA D. HARRIS, in her official capacity as Attorney General for the State of California, CHRISTINE BAKER, in her official capacity as the Director of the California Department of Industrial Relations, DIANE RAVNIK, in her official capacity as the Chief of the California Division of Apprenticeship Standards and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
STATE BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION TRADES COUNCIL OF CALIFORNIA, AFL-CIO
BNSF Railway Company, et al v. CSBE, et al
as 16-17130
Plaintiff - Appellee:
BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY and UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY
Defendant - Appellant:
CALIFORNIA STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, DAVID J. GAU, in his official capacity as Executive Director of the California State Board of Equalization, GEORGE RUNNER and others
Ulises Garcia, et al v. Kamala Harris
as 16-56125
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ULISES GARCIA, JORDAN GALLINGER, BRIAN HILL and others
Defendant - Appellee:
KAMALA D. HARRIS, Attorney General, in her official capacity as Attorney General of California
BNSF Railway Company, et al v. California State Board of Equalization, et al
as 3:2016cv04311
Plaintiff:
BNSF Railway Company and Union Pacific Railroad Company
Defendant:
California State Board of Equalization , David J. Gau , George Runner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Firearms Policy Coalition Second Amendment Defense Committee et al v. Harris
as 2:2016cv01144
Defendant:
Harris and Kamala D. Harris
Plaintiff:
Firearms Policy Coalition Second Amendment Defense Committee, Kris Koenig, Michael Schwartz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ulises Garcia et al v. Kamala Harris
as 2:2016cv02572
Plaintiff:
Scott Dipman, Lisa Jang, Ulises Garcia and others
Defendant:
Kamala D. Harris and Kamala Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fardia Baig v. Edmund G. Brown, Jr. et al
as 2:2015cv08963
Plaintiff:
Farida Baig
213) 897-7605 (fax:
Edmund G Brown, Jr
Defendant:
Martine Noel D Agostino, Martine Noel D Agostino, Does and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
