Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Heart to Heart Hospice of Tyler, Ltd. v. Sebelius
as 4:2010cv00275
Plaintiff:
Heart to Heart Hospice of Tyler, Ltd.
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Harris Hospice, Inc. v. Sebelius
as 4:2010cv00252
Plaintiff:
Harris Hospice, Inc.
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Maxxim Care EMS, Inc. v. Sebelius
as 4:2010cv01408
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius
Plaintiff:
Maxxim Care EMS, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kingsland Hospital, LP et al v. Sebelius
as 4:2010cv01055
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius
Plaintiff:
Kingsland Hospital, LP and St. Michael's Hospital & Healthcare Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Udeobong v. Sebelius
as 4:2010cv00535
Plaintiff:
Ita Udeobong dba Midland Care Medical Supply
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Anselmo v. Sebelius
as 1:2009cv00995
Plaintiff:
Charles Anselmo
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1320 a Recovery of civil monetary penalty & assessment
Cleveland Regional Medical Center v. Sebelius
as 1:2009cv00960
Plaintiff:
Cleveland Regional Medical Center
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
College Station Medical Center v. Sebelius
as 4:2009cv03539
Plaintiff:
College Station Medical Center
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
IHG Healthcare, Inc. v. Sebelius
as 4:2009cv03233
Plaintiff:
IHG Healthcare, Inc. and Grace Hospice of Texas
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Udeobong dba Midland Care Medical Supply v. Sebelius
as 4:2009cv02703
Plaintiff:
Ita Udeobong dba Midland Care Medical Supply
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Enforcement of Judgment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
