Cases 31 - 40 of 147
Smith v. Poston at the Park, LLC, The et al
as 3:2020cv00724
Plaintiff:
Peg Smith
Defendant:
Poston at the Park Homeowners' Association, Inc., The and Poston at the Park, LLC, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alpine Investors IV SBIC LP et al v. Smith et al (PLR2)
as 3:2020cv00285
Defendant:
Joel Zane Smith, J A Rohi Corporation, Z & S Consulting Limited and others
Plaintiff:
Beneco Systems, LLC, Alpine Investors IV SBIC, L.P., Alpine Investors IV, L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Smith et al v. Alpine Investors IV SBIC, L.P. et al (PLR1)
as 3:2020cv00267
Defendant:
Beneco Systems, LLC, Alpine Investors IV, L.P., Beneco Trust Company, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Zane Smith, J.A. Rohi Corporation, Z&S Consulting, Ltd. and others
Smith v. Edington (JRG1)
as 3:2019cv00362
Defendant:
Timothy L Edington
Plaintiff:
Charmane Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith et al v. Maydar et al (PLR3)
as 3:2019cv00322
Defendant:
Pyramid Technology Solutions, Inc., Infinistor, LTD., Natalie Maydar and others
Plaintiff:
Liquidation Station, Inc. and Bonner Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Queener et al
as 3:2019cv00725
Plaintiff:
Constance Smith
Defendant:
Henry Queener and State Farm Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Smith v. Capital One Bank
as 2:2019cv02492
Plaintiff:
Charmane Smith
Defendant:
Capital One Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. CitiBank, N.A.
as 2:2019cv02485
Defendant:
Citibank NA
Plaintiff:
Charmane Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
J. S. Haren Company v. Smith & Loveless, Inc.
as 1:2019cv00204
Defendant:
Smith & Loveless, Inc.
Plaintiff:
J. S. Haren Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
J. S. Haren Company v. Smith & Loveless, Inc. (TV2)
as 1:2019cv00205
Defendant:
Smith & Loveless, Inc.
Plaintiff:
J. S. Haren Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
