Cases 41 - 47 of 47
Premier Jet Services, LLC v. Cessna Aircraft Company
as 6:2008cv00699
Plaintiff:
Premier Jet Services, LLC
Defendant:
Cessna Aircraft Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Cumis Insurance Society, Inc. v. Racom Community Credit Union
as 3:2007cv00682
Plaintiff:
Cumis Insurance Society, Inc.
Defendant:
RACOM COMMUNITY CREDIT UNION, RACOM COMMUNITY CREDIT UNION, SIMCOE CREDIT UNION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Cessna Employees Credit Union et al v. Cuna Mutual Group et al
as 3:2007cv05771
Plaintiff:
Cessna Employees Credit Union, Cessna Employees Credit Union, Advantage Plus Federal Credit Union and others
Defendant:
Cuna Mutual Group and Cumis Insurance Society, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Cessna v. Standard Fire Insurance Company
as 2:2007cv07670
Plaintiff:
Gary M. Cessna and Gary M. Cessna
Defendant:
Standard Fire Insurance Company, Standard Fire Insurance Company and Standard Fire Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
JDI HOLDINGS LLC v. CESSNA AIRCRAFT COMPANY et al
as 3:2007cv00242
Plaintiff:
JDI HOLDINGS LLC
Defendant:
CESSNA AIRCRAFT COMPANY, JET MANAGEMENT INC and SOUTHERN JET CENTER LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Louisiana Agricultural & Finance Authority v. Twin City Aviation Center et al
as 1:2007cv00816
Plaintiff:
Louisiana Agicultural & Finance Authority and Louisiana Agicultural & Finance Authority
Defendant:
Twin City Aviation Center, Lycoming and Cessna Aircraft Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Cessna Employees Credit Union et al v. Lorimac Inc.
as 3:2007cv00120
Plaintiff:
Cessna Employees Credit Union, Cessna Employees Credit Union, Cessna Employees Credit Union and others
Defendant:
Lorimac Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
