Cases 61 - 70 of 145
USA v. Bell
as 5:2012cv00167
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Latasha M Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
USA v. Marshall
as 4:2012cv00239
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Angela Renee Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
USA v. Bell
as 4:2012cv00224
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Alfonzo Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
USA Truck, Inc. v. Great American Insurance Company et al
as 2:2012cv02046
Plaintiff:
USA Truck, Inc.
Defendant:
Great American Insurance Company and Great American Assurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Toriano-James Hervey Hopes Akwesi:ObaShango-El v. USA et al
as 4:2012cv00042
Plaintiff:
Toriano-James Hervey Hopes Akwesi:ObaShango-El
Defendant:
USA and Arkansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Basham et al v. American National County Mutual Ins Co et al
as 4:2012cv04005
Plaintiff:
Eddie Basham and Freda McClendon
Defendant:
American National County Mutual Ins Co , American National General Insurance Co , American National Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 caf
Doctors Testing Center LLC II v. USA et al
as 4:2011cv00857
Plaintiff:
Doctors Testing Center LLC II
Defendant:
USA, Barack Obama, Department of Health and Human Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Magness Oil Company et al v. Piedmont Fields, LLC et al
as 3:2011cv03104
Plaintiff:
Magness Oil Company , Benny W. Magness , Janie A. Magness and others
Defendant:
Piedmont Fields, LLC, Goodwin Law Firm, PLLC, The , Daniel R. Goodwin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
PengCheng Aluminum Enterprise Inc. USA v. A.D. Harrington Company
as 6:2011cv06077
Plaintiff:
PengCheng Aluminum Enterprise Inc. USA
Defendant:
A.D. Harrington Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Island et al v. Guarantee Company of North America USA
as 4:2011cv00706
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Island and Jeanette Carter
Defendant:
Guarantee Company of North America USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
