Contract Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 90
625 3rd Street Associates, LP v. The Board of the National Credit Union Administration et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv03820
Plaintiff: 625 3rd Street Associates, LP and 625 3rd Street Associates, LP
Defendant: The Board of the National Credit Union Administration and Kaiperm Federal Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Type: Contract None
Ahuruonye et al v. Patelco Credit Union et al
as 4:2009cv01225
Plaintiff: Blessing U. Ahuruonye
Defendant: Patelco Credit Union, Patelco Credit Union, Cal State 9 Credit Union and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Contract Defendant
NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION BOARD v. LOG HOME COMPONENTS, INC. et al
as 3:2008cv00193
Plaintiff: NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION BOARD
Defendant: LOG HOME COMPONENTS, INC. and LOG HOME MANUFACTURERS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Gulfstream Development Group, LLC v. Schwartz et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2008cv01643
Plaintiff: Gulfstream Development Group, LLC
Third_party_plaintiff: Jeremy A. Schwartz , Deena Schwartz , Sharon Schwartz and others
Third_party_defendant: Robert Morgan , Jay Siegall , Alyn Siegall and others
Cross_claimant: W. Lee Konken
Cross_defendant: Gulfstream Development Group, LLC , Brian Haag , Robert Morgan and others
Consol_third_party_plaintiff: Antonio J. Flores , Sandra V. Flores and Shailesh Gupta
Consol_third_party_defendant: Equity Trust Company Custodian
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Gulfstream Development Group, LLC v. Schwartz et al
as 2:2007cv00844
Plaintiff: Gulfstream Development Group, LLC and Gulfstream Development Group, LLC
Defendant: Jeremy A. Schwartz, Jeremy A. Schwartz, Deena Schwartz and others
Counter Claimant: Jeremy A. Schwartz, Deena Schwartz, Sharon Schwartz and others
Counter Defendant: Gulfstream Development Group, LLC, Gulfstream Development Group, LLC, Gulfstream Development Group, LLC and others
Third Party Plaintiff: Jeremy A. Schwartz, Deena Schwartz, Sharon Schwartz and others
Third Party Defendant: Brian Haag, Brian Haag, Robert Morgan and others
Cross Claimant: W. Lee Konken
Cross Defendant: Gulfstream Development Group, LLC, Gulfstream Development Group, LLC, Brian Haag and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Superior Choice Credit Union v. Norlarco Credit Union We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv01598
Plaintiff: Superior Choice Credit Union
Defendant: Norlarco Credit Union and Norlarco Credit Union
Interested Party: National Credit Union Administration and National Credit Union Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
National Credit Union Administration Board et al v. Chand & R Enterprises, Inc.
as 1:2007cv01262
Plaintiff: National Credit Union Administration Board and Punjab and Sindh Federal Credit Union
Defendant: Chand & R Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 USA Plaintiff
National Credit Union Administration Board v. Sindh Federal Credit Union et al
as 1:2007cv01261
Plaintiff: National Credit Union Administration Board and Sindh Federal Credit Union
Defendant: Mohinder Singh Sidhu
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819 Default of Promissory Note
National Credit Union Administration Board v. Women's Interart Center, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv02393
Plaintiff: National Credit Union Administration Board
Defendant: Women's Interart Center, Inc., Marguerite A. Lewitin and Veronica Geist
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 USA Plaintiff
NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION BOARD v. LOG HOME COMPONENTS, INC. et al
as 3:2007cv00032
Plaintiff: NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION BOARD
Defendant: LOG HOME COMPONENTS, INC. and JAMES A. NULL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?