Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Leaman v. Potter et al
as 3:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Tony Leaman
Defendant:
Corey Potter and The F/V Knot E Z, Official Number 270361
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Dehning et al v. Kodiak's Finest LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Cory Dehning and Joseph Beck
Defendant:
Kodiak's Finest LLC, Shawn Dochtermann and The F/V Isanotsky, O.N. 973897
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0554 Constitutionality of Maritime Statutes
Gilreath-Johnson v. Potter et al
as 3:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Austin Gilreath-Johnson
Defendant:
Corey Potter and The F/V Knot, Official Number 270361, Her Engines, Machinery, Appurtenances and Cargo, in Rem
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Albee v. Potter et al
as 3:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Justin Albee
Defendant:
Corey Potter, THE F/V KNOT E Z, Official Number 270361 and THE F/V GAMBLER, Official Number __
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Sanders v. Potter et al
as 3:2023cv00142
Plaintiff:
Nathan Sanders
Defendant:
Cory Potter and F/V GAMBLER, Official Number___
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Martinsen v. Potter et al
as 3:2023cv00143
Plaintiff:
Marc Martinsen
Defendant:
Corey Potter and The F/V Knot E Z
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1101 Violation of Maritime Regulations
Bodo v. Angasan et al
as 3:2023cv00035
Plaintiff:
Gracie Bodo
Defendant:
Brad Angasan, Renalda Angasan and F/V The Novarupta
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Borman v. Potter et al
as 3:2023cv00011
Plaintiff:
John Borman
Defendant:
Corey Potter, Knot E Z LLC and F/V The Knot E Z
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Gordon v. Potter et al
as 3:2023cv00010
Plaintiff:
John Gordon
Defendant:
Corey Potter and F/V Gambler
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Hannon v. Versteeg et al
as 3:2022cv00151
Plaintiff:
James Tyler Hannon
Defendant:
Kory Versteeg and F/V Guardian
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
