Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Promenade Plastics, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv01156
Plaintiff:
Promenade Plastics, Inc. and Foremost Insurance Company Grand Rapids, Michigan
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Promenade Plastics, Inc. v. Foremost Insurance Company Grand Rapids Michigan
as 4:2023cv01154
Plaintiff:
Promenade Plastics, Inc.
Defendant:
Foremost Insurance Company Grand Rapids Michigan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
DeWitt Insurance, Inc. v. Morrell et al
as 4:2020cv00839
Defendant:
Caren A. Morrell, Morrell Insurance Agency, LLC and Foremost Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
DeWitt Insurance, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scherrer v. Foremost Insurance Company Grand Rapids Michigan
as 4:2017cv00855
Plaintiff:
Nelson C. Scherrer
Defendant:
Foremost Insurance Company Grand Rapids Michigan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pepper et al v. Foremost Insurance Company Grand Rapids, Michigan
as 4:2016cv00726
Plaintiff:
Tonia Pepper and Thomas Pepper
Defendant:
Foremost Insurance Company Grand Rapids, Michigan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gier v. Foremost Insurance Company
as 2:2015cv04197
Plaintiff:
Adam Gier
Defendant:
Foremost Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lee v. Foremost Insurance Company Grand Rapids Michigan
as 4:2015cv00761
Plaintiff:
Potts Lee
Defendant:
Foremost Insurance Company Grand Rapids Michigan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Akram v. Foremost Insurance Company of Grand Rapids Michigan
as 4:2013cv02485
Plaintiff:
David Akram
Defendant:
Foremost Insurance Company of Grand Rapids Michigan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London v. Valley Hospitality, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv01193
Plaintiff:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London
Defendant:
Valley Hospitality, Inc., La'Vena Pratt, D.B.-P. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
