Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Lawson et al v. Pennsylvania College of Technology
as 1:2020cv00736
Plaintiff:
Michael James Lawson, Jr. and Tara Lawson
Defendant:
Pennsylvania College of Technology
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LAWSON et al v. DITECH FINANCIAL LLC et al
as 2:2017cv03243
Plaintiff:
MAMIE LAWSON and LEMUEL LAWSON
Defendant:
DITECH FINANCIAL LLC, GREENTREE SERVICING LLC, GREENTREE CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LAWSON et al v. DITECH FINANCIAL et al
as 2:2016cv05491
Plaintiff:
MAMIE LAWSON and LEMUEL LAWSON
Defendant:
DITECH FINANCIAL, GREENTREE SERVICING LLC., GREENTREE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LAWSON v. STILLWATER INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2015cv00649
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN LAWSON
Defendant:
STILLWATER INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHEEDY et al v. CITIMORTGAGE, INC.
as 2:2013cv03497
Plaintiff:
THOMAS SHEEDY, JR. , NANCY LYNN SHEEDY , LAWSON SHEEDY and others
Defendant:
CITI MORTGAGE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
SUNDANCE REHABILITATION CORP. v. LAWSON NURSING HOME, INC.
as 2:2013cv00453
Plaintiff:
SUNDANCE REHABILITATION CORP.
Defendant:
LAWSON NURSING HOME, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
MAPP et al v. EAST COAST CYCLE CENTER et al
as 2:2008cv03343
Plaintiff:
J. MAPP, L. LAWSON and J. LAWSON
Defendant:
EAST COAST CYCLE CENTER, QIANJIANG CO., HONDA CO. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Colgate-Palmolive Company v. Tandem Industries et al
as 3:2007cv01709
Plaintiff:
Colgate-Palmolive Company and Colgate-Palmolive Company
Defendant:
Tandem Industries, Gyp's Market, James Lawson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Steiple et al v. Lawson
as 3:2007cv00881
Plaintiff:
Stan Seiple, Stan Seiple, Penn Seiple and others
Defendant:
Gordon Lawson and Gordon Lawson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
