Cases 1 - 8 of 8
The Princeton Excess and Surplus Lines Insurance Company v. A.H.D. Houston, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv03680
Defendant:
A.H.D. Houston, Inc. d/b/a Centerfolds, Jennifer Xzharinova, Tiffany Toth and others
Plaintiff:
The Princeton Excess and Surplus Lines Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
DePuy Synthes Sales, Inc. et al v. Orthofix Medical, Inc. et al
as 4:2019cv00222
Plaintiff:
Medical Device Business Services, Inc. and DePuy Synthes Sales, Inc.
Defendant:
Scott Mackey, Orthofix Medical, Inc. and Miranda Middleton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DePuy Synthes Sales, Inc. et al v. Orthofix International N.V. et al
as 4:2019cv00122
Plaintiff:
Medical Device Business Services, Inc., DePuy Synthes Sales, Inc. and DePuy Spine, LLC
Defendant:
Scott Mackey, Miranda Middleton and Orthofix International N.V.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ABSOLUTE RESTORATION AND REMODELING v. MIDDLETON et al
as 4:2010cv03696
Defendant:
NATIONWIDE MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY and CASSANDRA MIDDLETON
Plaintiff:
ABSOLUTE RESTORATION AND REMODELING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4072
Innova Healthcare, LLP v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Texas et al
as 5:2010cv00236
Defendant:
Robert Alaniz, Tonya Allison, Thomas Almond and others
Plaintiff:
Innova Healthcare, LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv02262
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Default of Student Loan
D-Two Communications Incorporated v. Comtel et al
as 7:2009cv00031
Plaintiff:
D-Two Communications Incorporated
Defendant:
Comtel, Waleed Khalil, Abed Shadfan and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv03122
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080 Student Loan Recovery
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
