Cases 141 - 150 of 32,009
DigitalDoors, Inc. v. UMB Bank, N.A.
as 2:2024cv00320
Plaintiff:
DigitalDoors, Inc.
Defendant:
UMB Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
S3G Technology LLC v. Massage Envy Franchising LLC
as 6:2024cv00229
Plaintiff:
S3G Technology LLC
Defendant:
Massage Envy Franchising LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
VDPP LLC v. Canon USA Inc
as 3:2024cv00570
Plaintiff:
VDPP LLC
Defendant:
Canon U.S.A., Inc. and Canon USA Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
VDPP, LLC v. Boxlight Corporation
as 7:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
VDPP, LLC
Defendant:
Boxlight Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 100 Patent Infringement
QuickVault, Inc. v. AutoNation, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00476
Plaintiff:
QuickVault, Inc.
Defendant:
AutoNation, Inc., Bae Systems, Inc. and Honeywell International Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Analytical Technologies, LLC v. delivery.com, LLC
as 2:2024cv00306
Plaintiff:
Analytical Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
delivery.com, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Analytical Technologies, LLC v. Five Guys Properties, LLC
as 2:2024cv00307
Plaintiff:
Analytical Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
Five Guys Properties, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Analytical Technologies, LLC v. Roark Capital, Inc. d/b/a Subway
as 2:2024cv00308
Plaintiff:
Analytical Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
Roark Capital, Inc. d/b/a Subway
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Yeti Coolers, LLC v. Xiangsong
as 1:2024cv00263
Plaintiff:
Yeti Coolers, LLC
Defendant:
Qi Xiangsong doing business as CARDOQI
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Telsync Technologies LLC v. AT&T, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00295
Plaintiff:
Telsync Technologies LLC
Defendant:
AT&T, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
