Cases 31 - 40 of 91
Jennifer Bawcum v. Dynamic Forces, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv06694
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Bawcum
Defendant:
Dynamic Entertainment, Dynamic Forces, Inc. and Does 1 to 10
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Diane Blackman et al v. Teespring, Inc et al
as 3:2019cv01494
Defendant:
Teespring, Inc. and Does 1-3
Plaintiff:
Olivier Delmas, David Olenick, Alan Pirie and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Sergey Grishin v. Jennifer Sulkess
as 2:2018cv10179
Defendant:
Jennifer Sulkess and Does 1-10
Plaintiff:
Sergey Grishin
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Diane Blackman et al v. Teespring, Inc et al
as 2:2018cv08357
Plaintiff:
Olivier Delmas, David Olenick, Alan Pirie and others
Defendant:
Teespring, Inc and Does 1-3
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Tropical Textile, Inc. v. J and S, LLC, et al
as 2:2018cv03989
Plaintiff:
TROPICAL TEXTILE, INC.
Defendant:
J&S, LLC., SHOPTIQUES, INC., JENNIFER O'ROURKE and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
JOANNE FABRIC, INC. v. MARIGOLD FASHION, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv06854
Defendant:
THE DRESS BARN, INC., BRAD & ZOE, INC., PAPERDOLL WHOLESALE and others
Plaintiff:
JOANNE FABRIC, INC. and TROPICAL TEXTILE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Jennifer Aldawoodi DMD v. Clayton Cooke DDS et al
as 3:2017cv01698
Defendant:
Clayton Cooke DDS and DOES 1-10, inclusive
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Aldawoodi DMD
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
State of the Art Construction, Inc. v. Jennifer Spencer et al
as 2:2017cv02411
Defendant:
DOES, Christopher Glenn Hayman and Jennifer Spencer
Plaintiff:
State of the Art Construction, Inc.
Elohim EPF USA, Inc. v. Karaoke Phoenix Inc et al
as 2:2017cv00630
Defendant:
Jennifer Bittel, Degolmok, Inc, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Elohim EPF USA, Inc.
Jennifer Rondinelli Reilly v. YouTube, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv08016
Defendant:
Does, Google Inc. and YouTube, LLC
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Rondinelli Reilly
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
