Cases 41 - 48 of 48
Elektra Entertainment Group Inc. et al v. Joseph Gonzales
as 2:2008cv02785
Plaintiff:
Elektra Entertainment Group Inc., Elektra Entertainment Group Inc., Zomba Recording LLC and others
Defendant:
Joseph Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
CBT Nuggets, L.L.C. v. Trinh et al
as 6:2007cv06327
Plaintiff:
CBT Nuggets, L.L.C.
Defendant:
Li Trinh, Wallyz_World, Bmmotosales@422466.com and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
PC Mailing Services, Inc. v. Gonzales et al
as 5:2007cv00853
Plaintiff:
PC Mailing Services, Inc. and PC Mailing Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Aaron Michael Gonzales, AMG Printing & Mailing, LLC and John Robert Wicks, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
IO Group, Inc. v. Gonzales
as 3:2007cv05026
Plaintiff:
IO Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Gilbert Michael Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Shane Co. v. Pacific Diamond & Swiss Watch Exchange, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv01402
Plaintiff:
Shane Co.
Defendant:
Pacific Diamond & Swiss Watch Exchange, Inc. and Theodore G. Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Loneta Sue Carter v. Alberto Gonzales et al
as 5:2007cv00465
Plaintiff:
Loneta Sue Carter
Defendant:
Alberto Gonzales, Harley Lappin and Tereser A Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
Metzger v. Gonzales et al
as 3:2007cv00180
Plaintiff:
Pamela Jean Metzger
Defendant:
Alberto Gonzales, Harley Lapppin and Tereser A. Banks
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Berry v. Hawaiian Express Ser, et al
as 1:2003cv00385
Plaintiff:
Wayne Berry
Defendant:
Doe Individuals 1-350, Doe Corporations 1-20, Doe Entities 1-20 and others
Movant:
Richard Cohen and ES3 LLC
Mediator:
William G Meyer, III
Pecial_master:
Clyde Wm. Matsui
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
